The
earthquake rupture attracted the attention of seismologists because the Anninghe and Zemuhe faults ruptured during the same event; where a
restraining bend could not stop the rupture propagation. Restraining bends or zones of
transpression have been previously thought to arrest or cease an earthquake rupture. The restraining bend measuring 30° displayed
extensional tectonics was not effective and failed to arrest the rupture. Small
thrust faulting offsets of was also found, although a 2003
field survey and study found
fault scarps up to high. The associated surface ruptures were well-preserved with visible
fault scarps. Past earthquakes involving the Zemuhe Fault were also recorded in 6000 BC, 4250 BC, and 814 AD in the
paleoseismic records. The recurrence interval of large earthquakes on the fault is 1,400 to 1,700 years, with a minimum of 1,000 years. Rupture on the southern section of the Anninghe Fault also resulted in a zone of high-intensity shaking assigned VII–VIII. The surface offsets on the Anninghe Fault are much smaller, ranging from . Based on the historical documentation of the event and its associated surface ruptures, the total ruptured length on both faults is at least . A
seismic intensity isoseismic contour of VII–XI on the
China seismic intensity scale was determined along the rupture trace of the Zemuhe Fault, indicating most of the rupture took place on that fault. Calculating the
moment magnitude using the rupture length yielded a magnitude of 7.6–7.9 (7.6 ± 0.3). The Anninghe Fault
previously ruptured in 1536 based on paleoseismic evidence along the
fault trace. It had an estimated magnitude of 7.5 and ruptured a section of the fault. A maximum left-lateral offset of was estimated. ==Impact and aftermath==