The conference occurred in the wake of several important developments in Empire diplomacy. The
Chanak Crisis of 1922 was a threatened military conflict between the newly formed
Republic of Turkey and the
United Kingdom. During the crisis, the
British cabinet issued a
communiqué threatening to declare war against Turkey on behalf of the UK and the Dominions. British Prime Minister
David Lloyd George had not consulted the Dominions and Canada disavowed the British ultimatum: when
Canadian Prime Minister William Lyon Mackenzie King referred the issue to the Canadian parliament, it declared that it alone had the authority to declare war on behalf of Canada. The other Dominion prime ministers failed to support Lloyd George's action. When a new peace treaty, the
Treaty of Lausanne, was negotiated with Turkey in 1923, the Dominion governments did not participate in the negotiations or sign and they declared that the UK acted only for itself and not on behalf of the Dominions. In addition, prior to the Imperial Conference, Canada negotiated the
Halibut Treaty with the United States and did so without involving the United Kingdom or allowing the British government to sign on Canada's behalf. This was a departure from earlier practice in which the British government had sole responsibility for imperial foreign affairs and a constitutional right to conduct foreign policy on behalf of the dominions, including signing
treaties on their behalf. The British, Australian, and
New Zealand governments wished the conference to adopt a broad common foreign policy statement however Canadian Prime Minister
William Lyon Mackenzie King and South African Prime Minister
J. B. M. Hertzog argued that allowing the conference to make decisions that were binding on the dominions would encroach on their autonomy and that foreign policy of each Dominion should be determined by that Dominion's parliament (henceforth referred to as the King-Hertzog principle). == Results ==