1950s quiz show scandals

From the mid-1950s to the 1980s, there were three commercial broadcast television networks (the "Big Three") in the United States: ABC, CBS, and NBC. All three started out as broadcast radio networks, and by 1948, were broadcasting TV programs to multiple U.S. cities. DuMont Television Network was a fourth broadcaster from 1946 to 1956. Soon, quiz shows involved high-stakes money rewards. == Scandal ==

Twenty-One In September 1956, the game show Twenty-One, hosted by Jack Barry, premiered on NBC. Its first show was played legitimately, with no manipulation of the game by the producers at all. This initial broadcast was, in the words of co-producer Dan Enright, "a dismal failure", as the two contestants were so lacking in the required knowledge that they answered a large number of the questions incorrectly. Further, show sponsor Geritol, upon seeing this opening-night performance, reportedly became furious with the results and said that they did not want to see a repeat performance. Three months into its run, Twenty-One featured the contestant Herb Stempel. While Stempel was in the midst of his winning streak, both of the $64,000 quiz shows (The $64,000 Question and its spin-off, The $64,000 Challenge) were in the top-ten rated programs but Twenty-One did not have the same popularity. Enright and his partner, Albert Freedman, were searching for a new champion to replace Stempel to boost ratings. They soon found what they were looking for in Charles Van Doren, an English teacher at Columbia University. Van Doren decided to try out for the NBC quiz show Tic-Tac-Dough. Enright, who produced both Tic-Tac-Dough and Twenty-One, saw his tryout and was familiar with his prestigious family background that included multiple Pulitzer Prize-winning authors and highly respected professors at Columbia. As a result, Enright felt that Van Doren would be perfect as the new face of Twenty-One. Stempel was then asked to allow his new opponent, Van Doren, to win the game, and Stempel was coached by Enright on how to make it happen. A year later, Stempel told the New York Journal-Americans Jack O'Brian that his winning run as champion on the series had been choreographed to his advantage, and that the show's producer then ordered him to purposely lose his championship to Van Doren. With no proof, an article was never printed. The Big Surprise hosting The Big Surprise in March 1956 In December 1956, Dale Logue, a contestant on NBC's The Big Surprise, filed a lawsuit against the show's production company, Entertainment Productions, Inc., seeking either $103,000 in damages or reinstatement on the show as a contestant. Her claim was that, after being asked a question she did not know in a "warm-up" session, that she was asked the same question again during the televised show. Her assertion was that this was done intentionally with the express purpose of eliminating her as a contestant. At the time Logue's lawsuit was filed, Steve Carlin, executive producer of Entertainment Productions, Inc., called her claim "ridiculous and hopeless". Assertions that Logue had been offered $10,000 to settle in January 1957 were called baseless. Charles Revson, head of Revlon and ''The Big Surprise's'' primary sponsor, asked the producers if Logue's accusation was true, and was told that it was not. Dotto In August 1958, Stempel and Logue's credibility was bolstered when Edward Hilgemeier, Jr., a stand-by contestant on the game show Dotto three months earlier, sent an affidavit to the FCC claiming that while backstage, he had found a notebook on set containing the answers contestant Marie Winn was to deliver. ==Backlash==

In April 1957, Time magazine published an article detailing the depths to which producers managed game shows, just short of involving the contestants themselves. In August, Look magazine ran the article "Are TV Quiz Shows Fixed?", which concluded "it may be more accurate to say they are controlled or partially controlled." Through late 1958 and early 1959, quiz shows implicated by the scandal were quickly cancelled. Among them, with their last-aired dates, were: • The Big Surprise (April 2, 1957) • Dotto (August 15, 1958) • The $64,000 Challenge (September 7, 1958) • Twenty-One (October 16, 1958) • The $64,000 Question (November 2, 1958) • Tic-Tac-Dough, prime time edition (December 29, 1958) • For Love or Money (January 30, 1959) In late August 1958, New York prosecutor Joseph Stone convened a grand jury to investigate the allegations of the fixing of quiz shows. At the time of the empaneling, neither being a party to a fixed game show nor fixing a game show in the first place were crimes in their own right. Some witnesses in the grand jury acknowledged their role in a fixed show, while others denied it, directly contradicting one another. Many of the coached contestants, who had become celebrities due to their quiz show success, were so afraid of the social repercussions of admitting the fraud that they were unwilling to confess to having been coached, even to the point of perjuring themselves to avoid backlash. Producers who had legally rigged the games to increase ratings, but did not want to implicate themselves, their sponsors, or the networks in doing so, categorically denied the allegations. After the nine-month grand jury, no indictments were handed down and the judge sealed the grand jury report in August 1959. The expansion of the probe led CBS president Frank Stanton to immediately announce cancellation of three more of its large-prize quiz shows between October 16 and October 19, 1959: Top Dollar, The Big Payoff, and Name That Tune, explaining that this decision was made "because of the impossibility of guarding against dishonest practice". On November 2 when Van Doren said to the Committee in a nationally televised session:"I was involved, deeply involved, in a deception. The fact that I, too, was very much deceived cannot keep me from being the principal victim of that deception, because I was its principal symbol." ==Aftermath==

Law and politics All of the regulations regarding television in the late 1950s were defined under the Communications Act of 1934, which dealt with the advertising, fair competition, and labeling of broadcast stations. The act and regulations written by the FCC were indefinite in regard to fixed television programs. Because no specific laws existed regarding the fraudulent behavior in the quiz shows, whether the producers or contestants alike did anything illegal is debatable. Instead, one inference could be that the medium was ill-used. U.S. president Dwight D. Eisenhower signed the bill into law on September 13, 1960. The legislation allowed the FCC to require license renewals of less than the legally required three years if the agency believes it would be in the public interest, prohibited gifts to FCC members, and declared illegal any contest or game with intent to deceive the audience. In 2008, Van Doren broke his silence, describing his quiz show experience in an essay-length memoir published in The New Yorker. In 1970, producers exonerated Nadler, stating that they had shown him questions beforehand but that he already knew the answers and did not need them given to him. Hosts and producers In September 1958, a New York grand jury called producers who had coached contestants to appear in testimony. A prosecutor on the case later estimated that of the 150 sworn witnesses before the panel, only 50 told the truth. Hosts such as Jack Narz and Hal March continued to work on television after the scandals. Narz, who passed a lie-detector test at the time of the Dotto affair, had an extensive career as a game-show host after the incident (which also allowed him to help his brother, James, who later took on the name Tom Kennedy, break into the television business.) Sonny Fox, the original host of The $64,000 Challenge, left long before it could become tainted and became a popular children's television host, most notably of Wonderama. Fox later stated that his unintentional "predilection for asking the answers" was a factor in his decision to only rarely host game shows after the scandals. Television The quiz-show scandals exhibited the necessity for stronger network control over programming and production. Quiz-show scandals also justified and accelerated the growth of the networks' power over television advertisers concerning licensing, scheduling, and sponsorship of programs. The networks claimed to be ignorant, and victims of the scandals. The NBC president at the time stated, "NBC was just as much a victim of the quiz-show frauds as was the public." The first sign of the new enforcement came when American Safety Razor Company pulled its sponsorship of NBC's World Championship Golf match play series in April 1960 after a December 1959 taping of the match play tournament featured Sam Snead against Mason Rudolph. With the match tied on the 12th hole, Snead discovered a 15th club in his bag in violation of the Rules of Golf, which is a loss of hole penalty for each hole the extra club was in the bag. By rule, the violation made Rudolph the legal match winner, 11 and 7. Snead instead hid the violation and played the remainder of the match, letting Rudolph finish ahead after a full 18 holes, to avoid "spoiling the show". While the legality of the outcome was unaffected, Snead drew criticism for what amounted to recreating and misrepresenting the end of the match. The rule was changed in 1964 by capping the number of penalties for this violation to two, after which Snead would have been informed of the violation, changing the score automatically to Rudolph 2 up, with the seven holes remaining under the new rule, which is still in use. The audio and/or visual disclaimer "Portions of the program not affecting the outcome of the game have been edited and/or recreated" is often posted on game shows when scenes are reshot, and the host's reading of a question may be re-recorded after the fact. On Wheel of Fortune, three consecutive turns that are Lose a Turn, Bankrupt (without any money or prizes by the affected player), or letter called out that was not on the board, may be edited out, as might a Final Spin that lands on a penalty space. On The Price Is Right, if all four players overbid on a One Bid, the round may be edited out. All game shows will edit out questions thrown out for irregularities. A big-money quiz show did not return until ABC premiered 100 Grand in 1963. It went off the air after three shows, never awarding its top prize. Quiz shows still held a stigma throughout much of the 1960s, which was eventually eased by the success of the lower-stakes and fully legitimate answer-and-question game Jeopardy! upon its launch in 1964. Jeopardy! distinguished itself with a viewer-friendly format that offers "accessible clues and manageable categories" that the typical viewer has a realistic chance of being able to answer. Later incarnations of Jeopardy! substantially raised money values and removed limits on winning streaks. Barry and Enright eventually found a loophole in limits the networks imposed on winnings by selling shows directly into syndication, a business model the Federal Communications Commission was actively encouraging in the 1970s by way of rules such as the Prime Time Access Rule and Financial Interest and Syndication Rules. Its revival of Tic-Tac-Dough would regularly produce "six to eight" winners each year who netted more than the networks' limits, including one, Thom McKee, who would surpass Nadler's winnings with a total payday of $312,700 over a 46-episode run. Barry and Enright eventually brought its winnings limits into line with the networks' so that they could sell the programs to network owned-and-operated stations, particularly CBS Television Stations, who had shown interest in buying the show only if the producers would adhere to CBS network standards. ==See also==

• PBS Article on Radio Quiz Shows • The Quiz Show Scandal • Walter Karp: The Quiz-Show Scandal, in American Heritage, May/June 1989