The 1RM can also be estimated indirectly using repetition testing on submaximal loads, as popularized by the use of 1RM calculators. Although in many cases the estimate is reasonable, in other cases the estimate may vary by 10% or more from the actual 1RM. Using a specialized formula for the specific exercise improves accuracy. The use of
anthropometric variables such as gender, age, height, weight, body fat percentage, and girth does not improve accuracy. Also, most formulas are for experienced weightlifters, and novices may find their actual one rep maximum is much lower because their nervous system cannot handle the stress of a high weight. There are many formulas used to estimate 1RM using the submaximal method. In the formulas below, r is the number of repetitions performed and w is the amount of weight used (note that w is a factor of each formula, so the unit of measurement doesn't matter). Of the formulas, the Epley and the Brzycki formulas are most commonly used. Epley and Brzycki return identical results for 10 repetitions. However, for fewer than 10 reps, Epley returns a slightly higher estimated maximum. For example, if a person can lift 100 pounds on a given exercise for 10 reps, the estimated one rep max would be 133 pounds for both formulae. However, if the person were to complete only 6 reps, then Epley would estimate a one rep maximum of approximately 120 pounds, while Brzycki would return an estimate of approximately 116 pounds. Several more complex formulae have been proposed which use different coefficients for different rep numbers and sometimes even for different exercises. Compared to a formal 1RM test, the submaximal estimation method is safer and quicker. The estimate may not be accurate, but can be used as the starting point for a 1RM test. The formulas can also be used the other way, to calculate what weight is needed for a given repetition maximum, as a percent of the estimated or actual 1RM. ==See also==