Non-classical ions Non-classical ions differ from traditional cations in their
electronic structure: though chemical bonds are typically depicted as the sharing of electrons between two atoms, stable non-classical ions can contain three or more atoms that share a single pair of electrons. In 1939, Thomas Nevell and others attempted to elucidate the mechanism for transforming
camphene hydrochloride into
isobornyl chloride. In one of the proposed reaction mechanisms depicted in the paper, the positive charge of an intermediate cation was not assigned to a single atom but rather to the structure as a whole. This was later cited by opponents of the non-classical description as the first time that a non-classical ion was invoked. However, the term "non-classical ion" did not explicitly appear in the chemistry literature until over a decade later, when it was used to label delocalized bonding in a pyramidal, butyl cation. The term
synartetic ion was also invoked to describe delocalized bonding in stable carbocations before the term
non-classical ion was in widespread use. The first users of this term commented on the striking similarity between bonding in these types of cations and bonding in
borohydrides.
First non-classical proposals In 1949,
Saul Winstein observed that 2-
exo-norbornyl brosylate (
p-bromobenzenesulfonate) and 2-
endo-norbornyl
tosylate (
p-toluenesulfonate) gave a
racemic mixture of the same product, 2-
exo-norbornyl
acetate, upon
acetolysis (
see Figure 6). Since tosylates and brosylates work equally well as
leaving groups, he concluded that both the 2-
endo and 2-
exo substituted norbornane must be going through a common cationic intermediate with a dominant
exo reactivity. He reported that this intermediate was most likely a symmetric, delocalized 2-norbornyl cation. It was later shown via vapor phase chromatography that the amount of the
endo epimer of product produced was less than 0.02%, proving the high
stereoselectivity of the reaction. When a single
enantiomer of 2-
exo-norbornyl brosylate undergoes acetolysis, no optical activity is seen in the resulting 2-
exo-norbornyl acetate (
see Figure 7). Under the non-classical description of the 2-norbornyl cation, the plane of symmetry present (running through carbons 4, 5, and 6) allow equal access to both enantiomers of the product, resulting in the observed
racemic mixture. It was also observed that the 2-
exo-substituted norbornanes reacted 350 times faster than the corresponding
endo isomers. Anchimeric assistance of the sigma bond between carbons 1 and 6 was rationalized as the explanation for this kinetic effect. Importantly, the invoked
anchimeric assistance led many chemists to postulate that the energetic stability of the 2-norbornyl cation was directly due to the symmetric, bridged structure invoked in the non-classical explanation. However, some other authors offered alternative explanations for the high stability without invoking a non-classical structure. In 1951, it was first suggested that the 2-norbornyl cation could actually be better described when viewed as a nortricyclonium ion. It has been shown that the major product formed from an
elimination reaction of the 2-norbornyl cation is nortricyclene (not
norbornene), but this has been claimed to support both non-classical ion postulates.
Herbert C. Brown: a dissenting view Herbert C. Brown proposed that it was unnecessary to invoke a new type of bonding in stable intermediates to explain the reactivity of the 2-norbornyl cation. Criticizing many chemists for disregarding past explanations of reactivity, Brown argued that all of the aforementioned information about the 2-norbornyl cation could be explained using simple
steric effects present in the norbornyl system. Given that an alternative explanation using a rapidly equilibrating pair of ions for describing the 2-norbornyl cation was valid, he saw no need to invoke a stable, non-classical depiction of bonding. Invoking stable non-classical ions was becoming commonplace; Brown felt that this was not only unwarranted but also counterproductive for the field of chemistry as a whole. Indeed, many papers reporting stable non-classical ions were later retracted for being unrealistic or incorrect. After publishing this controversial view in 1962, Brown began a quest to find experimental evidence incompatible with the delocalized picture of bonding in the 2-norbornyl cation. Brown also worked to prove the instability of a delocalized electronic structure for the 2-norbornyl cation. If the non-classical ion could be proven to be higher in energy than the corresponding classical ion pair, the non-classical ion would only be seen as a transition state between the two asymmetric cations. Though he did not rule out the possibility of a delocalized transition state Brown continued to reject the proposed reflectional symmetry of the 2-norbornyl cation, even late in his career.
Impact The introduction of the three-centered two-electron delocalized bond invoked in the non-classical picture of the 2-norbornyl cation allowed chemists to explore a whole new realm of chemical bonds. Chemists were eager to apply the characteristics of hypovalent electronic states to new and old systems alike (though several got too carried away). One of the most fundamentally important concepts that emerged from the intense research focused around non-classical ions was the idea that electrons already involved in sigma bonds could be involved with reactivity. Though filled pi orbitals were known to be
electron donors, chemists had doubted that sigma orbitals could function in the same capacity. The non-classical description of the 2-norbornyl cation can be seen as the donation of an
electron pair from a carbon-carbon sigma bond into an empty p-orbital of carbon 2. Thus this carbocation showed that sigma-bond electron donation is as plausible as pi-bond electron donation. The intense debate that followed Brown’s challenge to non-classical ion proponents also had a large impact on the field of chemistry. In order to prove or disprove the non-classical nature of the 2-norbornyl cation, chemists on both sides of the debate zealously sought out new techniques for chemical characterization and more innovative interpretations of existing data. One spectroscopic technique that was further developed to investigate the 2-norbornyl cation was
nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of compounds in highly acidic media. Comparisons of the 2-norbornyl cation to unstable transition states with delocalized electronic states were often made when trying to elucidate whether the norbornyl system was stable or not. These efforts motivated closer investigations of transition states and vastly increased the scientific community’s understanding of their electronic structure. In short, vigorous competition between scientific groups led to an extensive research and a better understanding of the underlying chemical concepts. ==Formation==