2011 Maltese divorce referendum

A private member's bill was tabled in the House of Representatives by Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando, then a Nationalist Member of Parliament and Evarist Bartolo, then a Labour Member of Parliament. The text of the bill, which had been changed twice, did not provide for the holding of a referendum. This was eventually provided for through a separate Parliamentary resolution under the Referenda Act authorising a facultative, non-binding referendum to be held. The Catholic Church in Malta encouraged a "no" vote through a pastoral letter issued on the Sunday before the referendum day. Complaints were made that religious pressure was being brought to bear upon voters. ==Question==

Ballot papers had both English and Maltese questions printed on them. The English version of the question put to voters was as follows: The question, which resembled the proposal approved by Irish voters in the Irish divorce referendum of 1995, was somewhat controversial. It was claimed that it did not reflect the content of the private member's bill. ==Results==

Although for the purposes of the referendum the whole country was regarded to be a single constituency — taking into account electoral districts — in only three out of the thirteen did the "no" vote reach a majority. ==Aftermath==

Discussion on the divorce bill started in earnest soon after the result was announced. In the second and third readings a number of MPs still voted against the bill. Parliament approved the law on 25 July. The law came into effect on 1 October. ==See also ==