Many shops on the streets and in shopping malls were closed in Yuen Long and the neighbouring towns Tuen Mun, Tin Shui Wai and Tsuen Wan on 22 July 2019. Rumours spread online warned that there would be more violence on that day. Many companies allowed employees who live in the districts to leave work early that day. A news conference was held on 24 July by six people who were attacked and had decided to come forward with their stories. Several people in the group, including lawmaker Lam Cheuk-ting, stated they may appeal for financial compensation of damages in a court of law and file suite against the police and the
MTR Corporation. Lam also said that his political party would assist any others who wish to press charges and seek redress.
Reclaim Yuen Long protest Protests originally planned on 27 and 28 July in
Hung Hom-
To Kwa Wan,
Tseung Kwan O and
Hong Kong Islands West were rescheduled or postponed to make way for a Reclaim Yuen Long action on 27 July. However, the police issued the Letter of Objection, saying the proposed anti-mob march might 'create serious obstruction to the roads and pose a danger to marchers', after receiving pressure from the rural groups. The applicant announced he would instead walk alone along the originally proposed route and urged people not to follow him. Despite the risk of committing the
unlawful assembly offence, tens of thousands of people, or 288,000 as the original march applicant estimated, turned up in the town. Many protesters marched on
Castle Peak Road. The police fired
tear gas in the evening, including near residential areas. The police insisted that the tear gas shot did not affect the seniors living in an elderly home nearby, though photos showed otherwise. Starting from 5 pm, the police fired canisters of tear gas upon protesters near
Sai Pin Wai village and Nam Pin Wai Village, while protesters hurled objects in return. While
MTR had arranged special trains in
Long Ping station to help protesters to leave Yuen Long, Protesters fleeing to
Yuen Long station were followed by the
Special Tactical Squad, and a standoff occurred inside the station. In the protest, a passenger car near
Nam Pin Wai was vandalised by the protesters. that looked the same as the weapons brandished by the white-shirted men in the 21 July attacks, as well as a hat that resembled the uniform of Mainland law enforcement. Online rumours arose regarding the identity of a personal name that was found on a bill inside the car, claiming that person was connected to the
Liaison Office, which the Liaison Office denied.
Monthly Yuen Long sit-ins On 21 August 2019, thousands of demonstrators staged a sit-in protest at Yuen Long station to demand justice and to remember the victims of the mob attacks that had occurred exactly one month prior on 21 July. On the 21st day of each month, citizens staged sit-ins or assemblies in Yuen Long, especially inside Yuen Long station or the neighbouring
YOHO Mall. 821元朗靜坐 17.jpg|21 August 2019 sit-in at Yuen Long station Yuen Long Station assembly 20200121.jpg|21 January 2020 assembly at Yuen Long station DSCF2470 (49605304143).jpg|Sit-in on 21 February 2020 inside
Yuen Long Light Rail stop Police release tear gas in Yuen Long 20200321.png|On 21 March 2020, police fired tear gas in Yuen Long YOHO Mall assembly 20200421.png|On 21 April 2020, people gathered in YOHO Mall
Narrative by police While the police and the government initially recognised that the incident was "violent" and "shocking", as the attackers assaulted the commuters inside the Yuen Long MTR station, the police attempted to reshape the narrative in their favour over the following year. The police force refused to apologise for its slow response, despite recognising that the police's response that day had failed to live up to the public's expectations. After the retirement of
Stephen Lo, the new police commissioner,
Chris Tang, said that the incident only became heated when lawmaker
Lam Cheuk-ting arrived at the station stirring up the confrontation. The police's account aligned with that of Junius Ho's and pro-Beijing group's accusation that Lam intentionally stirred up the conflict, intensified the tense atmosphere and eventually caused a "fight". Superintendent Kong Wing-cheung later echoed Tang's statement, saying that the attack started because "a group" had led the protesters to Yuen Long, though he later backtracked by saying that it was only his "personal observation". The
Independent Police Complaints Council, which was controlled by pro-Beijing individuals, concluded the Yuen Long attack had been a "gang fight". Lam Cheuk-ting was arrested on 26 August 2020 for "rioting" for showing up in Yuen Long station on 21 July 2019, in addition to another non-violence related charge pertaining to events of 6 July 2019. The police, on the day of Lam's arrest, further changed the account and said that the incident was a clash "between two evenly matched rivals", Fellow lawmaker,
Wu Chi-wai, commenting on Lam's arrest, added that "the prosecution is '
calling a deer a horse' and twisting right and wrong". In the 2020 IPCC report, the police claimed the incident was instigated by "a gang fight involving a sizeable number of participants from both sides," which was met with rebuttals. Members of the
Yuen Long District Council criticised the police of rewriting history. Lawyer
Antony Dapiran accused the police of "
gaslighting of the highest order".
Clifford Stott, who was once an IPCC's consultants, said the police were trying to write "their own history of 2019" that fit with their "ideological position of portraying the protest crowds as irrational mobs".
Gwyneth Ho, a former
Stand News reporter who was assaulted by one of the white-clad men while livestreaming during the attack, added that any attempt by the police to distort the facts would be futile because the event was among the most live-streamed incidents of 2019.
Prosecution of suspects In July 2021, seven of the charged were convicted and sentenced to terms between three-and-a-half to seven years. In September 2022, an eighth man was convicted for his role in the attack.
Criticism of prosecution The police failed to arrest the perpetrators adequately immediately following the attack. The role of
Junius Ho in the attack was not investigated, and the police did not invite the victims of the attacks to identify the suspects. As of 28 July 2020, 58 people, aged 18 to 61, have been arrested, and 15 of them were charged with rioting. Six months after the attack, most shops in the area had not been contacted by police for evidence. In February 2021, judge Eddie Yip accused lead prosecutor
Anthony Chau Tin-hang of glossing over important facts, such as who started the attacks. The Yuen Long attack was widely considered to be the
turning point of the protests, as the police's inadequate response and alleged collusion with the triads crippled people's confidence in the police and turned a lot of citizens who were politically neutral or apathetic against the police. Amidst frustration that authorities had refused to prosecute pro-government violent counter-protesters and being increasingly distrustful of police, some protesters became more radical.
Charges against investigative journalist Choy Yuk-ling (also called Bao Choy), a freelance journalist who filmed a documentary about the mob attack on pro-democracy protesters for Radio Television Hong Kong (RTHK) was arrested by police on the evening of 3 November 2020, charged with misusing a government vehicle licensing database and making false statements to obtain information and records about car owners. She tried to discover the owners of a few vehicles suspected of supplying weapons to the attackers who launched an indiscriminate attack on scores of people. The owners of cars were identified as rural village leaders. She checked a box to declare that the vehicle registration searches were for "other traffic and transport related matters". Other options available when accessing the database are "legal proceedings" and "sale and purchase of vehicle". While the previously available option "other purposes" had been scrapped, the magistrate said that Choy should have considered other means to obtain the information. Police dismissed allegations that the arrest was an attack on press freedom. Choy was found guilty on 22 April 2021 and fined HK$6,000. The
Foreign Correspondents Club on 22 April strongly criticised the verdict as setting a "dangerous precedent" for "legal action against journalists for engaging in routine reporting". To the FCC statement, on 23 April a spokesperson from the
Hong Kong Liaison Office responded by saying that the FCC statement had "openly vilified the SAR Government and trampled upon the rule of law on the pretext of press freedom", and that the FCC should "know [its] place". Choy was exonerated by the
Court of Final Appeal on 5 June 2023. ==Reaction==