Switzerland allows its citizens to launch a
facultative referendum to contest a law adopted by the Swiss Federal Assembly, the federal parliament. In order to qualify, the petition must have at least 50,000 signatures within 100 days after the publication of the new law in the
Federal Gazette. The evangelical Christian party
Federal Democratic Union of Switzerland (EDU) had already announced in June 2020 that they would launch a referendum against the legalisation of same-sex marriage. After lengthy discussions, initiated by a 2013 bill by the
Green Liberal Party of Switzerland, the Federal Assembly adopted a bill for the legalisation of same-sex marriage in 2020. It was supported by the federal government and all political parties, except most of the right-wing
Swiss People's Party, about half of the
Centre party, and the EDU. The amendment to the Civil Code was published in the
Federal Gazette on 31 December 2020, leaving opponents to collect signatures against the law until 10 April 2021. There were three referendum committees. The first, by the EDU, called itself "No to marriage for all". The second, by members of parliament from the Swiss People's Party (SVP), the Centre and the
Evangelical People's Party of Switzerland was called "No to sperm donation for same-sex couples". A third committee called "No to the commodification of children" was launched by members of parliament of the SVP from
the Canton of Valais; they also called themselves "For the Family Foundation". On 12 April 2021, opponents of same-sex marriage announced that they had collected 59,176 certified signatures and brought them to the
Federal Chancellery. On 27 April, the Chancellery certified 61,027 valid signatures, which meant that the law would be submitted to a vote. On 19 May, the
Federal Council decided that the referendum would take place on 26 September 2021. In the discussions leading up to the vote, the proponents of equal marriage including the federal minister of justice,
Karin Keller-Sutter, highlighted the need to end discrimination and inequality; they said that the law would be a step towards ending the stigmatization and social discrimination against same-sex couples. The opponents of the amendment, primarily from conservative circles, advanced the argument of respecting tradition; they also said that changing the definition of marriage would need a constitutional rather than statutory amendment. But their principal arguments related to child welfare, such as the right of a child to know one's father, which they said would be in jeopardy for the children of female same-sex couples. == Opinion polls ==