In
The New York Times,
Orville Prescott called it "a first novel of considerable charm and much promise," noting its originality, "combination of wistful melancholy and tart humor," and "smooth, precise, graceful prose, bright with wit and sparkling with imaginative phrases." Less positively, he felt it "doesn't go far enough," "seems too slight to support so many pages," and had "too many repetitions, too many stretches where Mr. Beagle's fancy falters." While a month later,
Edmund Fuller characterized the book as "a striking debut on several counts," possessed of "wit, charm and individuality–with a sense of style notable in a first novel." He disliked what he saw as tendencies to "occasional strident, inappropriate, irrelevant vulgarism" and sentimentality, and viewed the portrayed "philosophical concept of death [as] shallow." Nonetheless, he concluded Beagle was an author to watch. Tom Morrow, whose review called the novel "a droll fantasy" in its title, referred to the novel as "a work-a-day little book–nothing unusual," before going on to illustrate all the unusual things about it. He devoted his column largely to plot summary. George W. Feinstein stated that "[b]ased on a mildly amusing situation and fortified by mildly amusing dialogue, this fantasy suffers from distention." The book has also received extensive review coverage in the science fiction and fantasy genre magazines.
Galaxy reviewer Floyd C. Gale rated it five stars out of five, praising the novel as "tender, funny, and wise, about as different (and good) as a 'ghost' story can be." Reviewing a mid-1970s reissue,
Richard A. Lupoff described it as "a marvelous fantasy. ... funny, gentle, tender, and profound." Commenting on a 2007 edition,
Charles de Lint called the novel "a great book," and "one of my favorite books," which on rereading he found "just as wonderful as I remembered it to be: beautifully written, the characters warmly drawn, the pages filled with conversations that run the gamut of the human condition." While he felt it "might seem quaint as it takes its time to tell its story," he noted "there's a reason that people still read
Dickens and
Austen, and there's a reason they'll appreciate this book: quality counts.". Other reviewers include
Gahan Wilson in
The Magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction, October 1969,
Spider Robinson, also in
Galaxy, June 1977, and
Darrell Schweitzer in
Science Fiction Review, February 1978. ==In other media==