A/UX 1.0 was criticized in the April 1988
InfoWorld review for having a largely
command line interface as in other Unix variants, rather than
graphical as in System 6. Its networking support was praised.
BYTE in 1989 listed A/UX 1.1 among the "Excellence" winners of the
BYTE Awards, stating that it "could make Unix the multitasking operating system of choice during the next decade" and challenge
OS/2. Compared to contemporary workstations from other Unix vendors, however, the Macintosh hardware lacks features such as
demand paging. The first two versions of A/UX consequently suffered poor performance,
MacUser said that after months of lab testing, it "easily meets or exceeds nearly all our expectations. ... A/UX 2.0 is, on the whole, a superb combination of the Mac and UNIX System V 2.2 and 4.3 BSD extensions ... A/UX is the most interesting and impressive software to have come out of Apple since
HyperCard. A/UX 2.0 is not just great UNIX software – it's great Macintosh software." The review considered system performance adequate except maybe for heavy use of
CAD and compilers, even on the fastest
Macintosh IIfx which has less UNIX speed than the average workstation like a
SPARCstation 1+. A/UX 3.0 was praised in the August 1992 issue of
InfoWorld by the same author as the publication's 1988 review, describing it as "an open systems solution with the Macintosh at its heart" where "Apple finally gets Unix right". He praised the GUI, single-button point-and-click installer, one year of personal tech support, the graphical help dialogs, and the user's manuals, saying that A/UX "defies the stereotype that Unix is difficult to use" and is "the easiest version of Unix to learn". Its list price of is much higher than that of "much weaker" competing PC operating systems such as System 7,
OS/2,
MS-DOS, and
Windows 3.1, but low compared to the then prevailing proprietary Unix licenses of more than . The review found the system speed "acceptable but not great" even on the fastest Quadra 950, blaming not the software but the incomplete Unix optimization found in Apple's hardware. Though "a very good value", the system's price-performance ratio was judged as altogether uncompetitive against Sun's SPARCstation 2. The reviewers thought it unlikely for users "to want to buy Macs just to run A/UX" and would have awarded
InfoWorlds top score if the OS was not proprietary to Macintosh hardware. ==See also==