Rise of the legend The Abhiyaza story first appeared in
Hmannan Yazawin (the Glass Palace Chronicle), completed in 1832. The Burmese chronicles down to the early 18th century, including
Maha Yazawin (the Great Chronicle) of 1724, upon which Hmannan is heavily based, do not mention Abhiyaza. Instead, the pre-
Hmannan origin story of the Burmese monarchy speaks of one Pyusawhti, son of a solar spirit and a dragon princess, who later founded the
Pagan Dynasty. Historians trace the rise of the Abhiyaza story to the 1770s, part of the early Konbaung kings' efforts to promote a more orthodox version of
Theravada Buddhism. The trend gained ground under King
Bodawpaya (r. 1782–1819) who, like his father
Alaungpaya, believed that he was the next Buddha,
Maitreya. Though the king would later reluctantly give up his claim and accede to his late father's claim, his purification drive devalued "local sources of sanctity" in favor of "universal textual forms endorsed by the crown and the
monkhood", and "outlawed animal sacrifices atop
Mt. Popa and other sacred sites while female and transvestite shamans lost status." In the reign of his successor
Bagyidaw in 1832, the pre-Buddhist origin story of Pyusawhti was officially superseded with the Abhiyaza story's "claims of royal descent from the clan of Gotama Buddha and thence the first Buddhist king of the world, Maha Sammata". The Abhiyaza story was part of a region-wide phenomenon where, in addition to the
Burmese Monarchs, various Buddhist states from as far afield as
Dali Kingdom (present-day
Yunnan) to
Lan Na (Chiang Mai) and
Nan (present-day northern
Thailand) linked their royalty to the Buddha or the Buddhist Emperor
Asoka. Various Shan chronicles, like the
Hmannan, also claim their
sawbwas' descent from the Buddha. (It is not clear when the similar linkages first appeared in Dali or Lan Na chronicles.)
Significance The story of Abhiyaza had a devastating effect on the credibility of the Burmese chronicles in general, and the early history narratives in particular during the
British colonial period. European scholars of the era outright dismissed the chronicle tradition of early Burmese history as "copies of Indian legends taken from Sanskrit or Pali originals". They highly doubted the antiquity of the chronicle tradition and dismissed the possibility that any sort of civilization in Burma could be much older than 500 CE. (Phayre 1883) puts Abhiyaza and his Tagaung dynasty under the List of Legendary Kings. (Harvey 1925) does not even include Abhiyaza and the Tagaung line in his list of monarchs; Harvey's list starts with the older origin story: Pyusawhti. One prominent historian on Burma,
Than Tun, lamented the inclusion of the legend into the official chronicle in 1832 and bluntly criticized the chroniclers for giving colonial-era historians, who he felt had written heavily biased histories, ammunition to denigrate Burmese history. Modern research has rehabilitated the credibility of the chronicles' early history to a degree. The Abhiyaza myth notwithstanding, recent research does indicate that many of the places mentioned in the royal records have indeed been inhabited continuously for at least 3500 years. Archaeological evidence indicates the states of Tagaung, Sri Ksetra, and Pagan all existed though not in the linear order portrayed in the chronicles. ==See also==