Social Security Act Amendments of 1939 H.R.6635 Approved, August 10, 1939, Public Law 76-379
Expansion of benefits The original Act provided for only one Federally-administered benefit: Old-Age Insurance, which was paid only to the insured worker. The 1938 Amendments transformed the very nature of the Social Security program. The Amendments created two new benefit categories under §202 of the Act: • Payments to the spouse and children of a retired worker called
dependents or family benefits, a provision of Old-Age Insurance. • Payments to the family of an insured worker in the event of the premature death of the worker, called
survivors benefits, the provision of the then-newly created Survivors Insurance program. Retirement-aged wives, children under 16 (under 18 if attending school), widowed mothers caring for eligible children, and aged widows were all made eligible for dependents and survivors benefits. Under select circumstances, parents of deceased insured workers were also made eligible for Survivors Insurance. To be eligible parents must be at least age 65, not entitled to Old-Age Insurance, wholly dependent upon the insured worker for income, and mustn't have married since the death of the insured worker. Furthermore, the parent(s) are not eligible if the deceased insured worker leaves a widow or unmarried surviving child under the age of 18. The 1938 Amendments also increased benefit amounts and accelerated the start of monthly benefit payments from 1940 to 1942.
Alteration of financing mechanisms The Old-Age Reserve Account previously established under §201 of the Act was replaced by the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund, administered by a Board of Trustees. The
Secretary of the Treasury,
Secretary of Labor, and the Chairman of the Social Security Board were all
ex-officio members. The composition of the Board of Trustees has been significantly altered since.
War Mobilization and Reconversion Act of 1944 S.2051 Approved, October 3, 1944 Public Law 78-458 Title XII
Social Security Act Amendments of 1946 H.R.7037 Approved, August 10, 1946 Public Law 79-719 Title XIII
Social Security Act Amendments of 1950 H.R.6000 Approved August 28, 1950 Public Law 81-734 These amendments raised benefits for the very first time and placed the program on the road to the virtually universal coverage it has today. Specifically it is the introduction of the cost-of-living adjustment (COLA).
H.R.6291 Approved June 28, 1952 Public Law 82-420
Social Security Act Amendments of 1952 H.R.7800 Approved, July 18, 1952 Public Law 82-590
Social Security Act Amendments of 1954 H.R.9366 Approved September 1, 1954 Public Law 83-761 The Social Security Act Amendments of 1954 significantly expanded the Social Security system by extending coverage to approximately 10 million additional people, including self-employed farmers, most self-employed professionals, and state or local government employees on a voluntary basis via referendum. Major changes included a 13% general increase in monthly benefits and a rise in the maximum annual earnings base from $3,600 to $4,200, with a scheduled tax rate increase to 4.0% by 1975. To assist newly covered workers and those with irregular histories, the law introduced a "dropout" provision allowing for the exclusion of up to five years of low or no earnings from benefit calculations. Furthermore, the amendments established a "disability freeze" to protect the insured status and benefit levels of workers during periods of total disability (defining it as a medically determinable impairment lasting at least six months) while also liberalizing the retirement earnings test to a uniform annual basis of $1,200 and lowering the age for exempt earnings from 75 to 72.
H.R.9709 Approved September 1, 1954 Public Law 83-767 Title XV
Social Security Amendments of 1956 Approved August 1, 1954 Public Law 84-880
Maternal and Child Health and Mental Retardation Planning Amendments of 1963 H.R.7544 Approved, October 24, 1963 Public Law 88-156 Title XVII
Social Security Amendments of 1965 H.R.6675 Approved, July 30, 1965 Public Law 89-97 Title XVIII Title XIX
U.S. Supreme Court cases Two
Supreme Court rulings affirmed the constitutionality of the Social Security Act. •
Steward Machine Company v. Davis, 301 U.S., 548 (1937) held in a 5–4 decision that given the exigencies of the
Great Depression, "[It] is too late today for the argument to be heard with tolerance that in a crisis so extreme the use of the moneys of the nation to relieve the unemployed and their dependents is a use for any purpose narrower than the promotion of the
general welfare." The arguments opposed to the Social Security Act articulated by justices
Butler,
McReynolds, and
Sutherland in their opinions were that the Social Security Act went beyond the powers that were granted to the federal government in the
U.S. Constitution. They argued that by imposing a tax on employers that could be avoided only by contributing to a state
unemployment-compensation fund, the federal government was essentially forcing each state to establish an unemployment-compensation fund that would meet its criteria and that the federal government had no power to enact such a program. •
Helvering v. Davis, 301 U.S. 619 (1937), decided on the same day as
Steward, upheld the program: "The proceeds of both [employee and employer] taxes are to be paid into the Treasury like internal-revenue taxes generally, and are not earmarked in any way." That is, the Social Security Tax was constitutional as a mere exercise of Congress's general taxation powers.
Other cases •
Flemming v. Nestor, 363 U.S. 603 (1960) upholding §1104, allowing Congress to itself amend and revise the schedule of benefits. Further, however, recipients of benefits had no contractual rights to them. •
Goldberg v. Kelly 397 U.S. 254 (1970)
William Brennan Jr. held there must be an evidentiary hearing before a recipient can be deprived of government benefits under the due process clause of the
Fourteenth Amendment. •
Weinberger v. Wiesenfeld (1975) held that a male widower should be entitled to his deceased wife's benefit just as a female widow was entitled to a deceased husband's, under the equal protection and due process clauses of the
Fourteenth Amendment. ==Impacts==