Zenz has been the target of a pro-Beijing
disinformation campaign, according to U.S.-based cybersecurity firm
Mandiant. A fabricated letter was spread through
fake news sites, alleging that Zenz received direct funding from US government entities.
Xinjiang Zenz's work to expose human rights abuses in Xinjiang has been the subject of widespread international attention and has frequently been cited in media reports. An analysis published by the
Mercator Institute for China Studies in January 2019 said that estimates by Zenz and others that one million Uyghurs had been subject to extrajudicial detention were "credible but remain unavoidably imprecise" and cited Zenz's 2018 study as one of two important studies that "popularized" this number. As a result of his work on Xinjiang, Zenz has become a target for coordinated disinformation attacks from pro-Beijing and Chinese state-run media as well as other state-affiliated entities. Zenz and his work on Xinjiang have been criticized by the Chinese government, which, according to
The Globe and Mail, "has called his findings 'lies'—even when it confirmed them". On 2 April 2021, a court in Kashgar accepted the civil case brought by a textile company in Xinjiang against Zenz for defamation. During an interview with
The Daily Telegraph, published in May 2021, Zenz defended himself against allegations of fabrication, noting that 95% of documents he had analyzed were publicly available government records. He has become the target of repeated cyber attacks, receiving many
attempted hacking attacks via email from people posing as Uyghurs. In December 2023, the
Financial Times reported that an agent of the
Zhejiang branch of the
Ministry of State Security had been tasked with discrediting Zenz. The European Union, United States, United Kingdom, and Canada imposed coordinated sanctions against Chinese government officials over human rights abuses in Xinjiang in March 2021. The sanctions against Zenz prohibit him from entering the China and restrict his ability to do business with Chinese firms. and as offering a "rare insight" into Tibetan education with "fascinating" details and of "immense value". In 2020, a report from
Reuters wrote that the news agency had "corroborated Zenz's findings and found additional policy documents, company reports, procurement filings and state media reports" regarding a growing mass labor program in Tibet. Barnett, however, criticized the methods used in creating a report written by Zenz and published in September 2020 by the Jamestown Foundation, writing that it had not been peer-reviewed prior to publication, did not refer to the findings of other Tibet researchers, and had not been independently verified by field research. He also criticized the timing of and media coverage surrounding the report's publication, arguing that it had been "coordinated with a prominent media campaign" and that notable newspapers had misrepresented the report by overstating Zenz's conclusions regarding the existence of labor camps in Tibet. ==Criticism==