According to Art.1, this agreement covers all industrial and agricultural products, with the exception of services, sanitary and phytosanitary measures (as defined by
Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures) and "purchasing specifications prepared by governmental bodies for production or consumption requirements of governmental bodies" (Art. 1.4). The scope of the TBT consists of substantive scope (what measures are included), personal scope (to whom the measures apply), and temporal scope.
Substantive scope There are three categories of substantive measures found in Annex 1 of the TBT; technical regulations, standard, and conformity assessment. The Appellate Body in
EC-Asbestos held these to be a limited class of measures. Technical regulation: Annex 1.1 This lays down product characteristics or their related processes and production methods, including the applicable administrative provisions, with which compliance is mandatory. It may also include or deal exclusively with terminology, symbols, packaging, marking, or labelling requirements as they apply to a product, process, or production method. For example, a law requiring that batteries be rechargeable or a law requiring that wine be sold in green glass bottles is a technical regulation within the meaning of the TBT Agreement. The rules specifically applicable to technical regulations are set out in Articles 2 and 3 of the TBT Agreement. In EC-Asbestos, the Appellate Body laid down a number of considerations for the determination of technical regulations. First, for a measure to be a "technical regulation", it must stipulate or provide "product characteristics". With respect to the term "characteristics", the Appellate Body noted: The "characteristics" of a product include, in our view, any objectively definable "features", "qualities", "attributes", or other "distinguishing mark" of a product. Such "characteristics" might relate, inter alia, to a product's composition, size, shape, colour, texture, hardness, tensile strength, flammability, conductivity, density, or viscosity. Secondly, a "technical regulation" lays down product characteristics or their related PPMs "with which compliance is mandatory". According to the Appellate Body, it follows that, with respect to products, a "technical regulation" has the effect of prescribing or imposing one or more "characteristics"—"features", "qualities", "attributes", or other "distinguishing mark". Thirdly, the AB held that a "technical regulation" must "be applicable to an identifiable product or group of products".
Standard: annex 1.2 A standard is a document approved by a recognized body that stipulates guidelines or characteristics that are not mandatory. It may include terminology, symbols, packaging or labelling requirements, and may apply to a product, process or production method. Standards are distinct from technical regulation in that they are not mandatory. Despite being voluntary, producers often have no choice but to comply with them for commercial practicality. Standards are guided by Article 4 TBT and Codes of Good Practice.
Conformity assessment: annex 1.3 A conformity assessment is a direct or indirect procedure used to determine the fulfillment of requirements in a technical regulation or standard. Conformity assessments may include sampling, testing, and inspections. The rules for conformity assessment are outlined in Articles 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 TBT.
Issues of scope Determining whether a measure is a technical regulation or a standard Whether a measure is a technical regulation as opposed to a standard centers on whether it is "mandatory". The Panel and Appellate Body in
Tuna-Dolphin GATT Case (I and II) held that the US labeling measures for dolphin-safe tuna was a technical regulation. The requirements were not compulsory for the sale of tuna in the US, however the requirements were compulsory for dolphin-safe certification. The Appellate Body stated that because the US provided no other methods of obtaining the dolphin-safe label, the requirement was binding, and therefore mandatory. It appears from this decision that measures that attempt to obtain a monopoly over a specific label will be deemed technical regulations, but the test is ultimately on a case-by-case basis. This decision has been criticised for construing the term "mandatory" too broadly, rendering the distinction between technical regulations and standards meaningless.
Application to non-product related processes Labels such as "free-range", "organic", or "fair trade", denote a quality in the product that has no tangible effects. Whether labels regarding non-product related process ("NPRP") are technical regulations is the subject of controversy. Annex 1.1 states that technical regulations apply to "product characteristics or their
related process and production methods", implying that this does not extend to NPRPs. However the second sentence of Annex 1.1 and 1.2 omits the word "related", suggesting that technical regulations may apply to labelling. Some academics argue that sentence 2 is read in context of sentence 1, and should therefore be given narrower scope. The Panel in
Tuna-Dolphin GATT Case (I and II) did not clarify this issue, but held in that case that the dolphin-safe labeling was a technical regulation by reason of the second sentence. Accordingly, it may be assumed that labeling of NPRP-PPM products now fall under the scope of technical regulations. == Key principles & obligations==