Origins during flight testing at
NAWS China Lake, 1952 During
World War II, various researchers in Germany designed infrared guidance systems of various complexity. The most mature development of these, codenamed
Hamburg, was intended for use by the
Blohm & Voss BV 143 glide bomb in an anti-ship role.
Hamburg used a single IR
photocell as its detector along with a spinning disk with lines painted on it, alternately known as a "reticle" or "chopper". The reticle spun at a fixed speed, causing the output of the photocell to be interrupted in a pattern, and the precise timing of the resulting signal indicated the bearing of the target. Although
Hamburg and similar devices like
Madrid were essentially complete, the work of mating them to a missile had not been carried out by the time the war ended. In the immediate post-war era, Allied
military intelligence teams collected this information, along with many of the engineers working on these projects. Several lengthy reports on the various systems were produced and disseminated among the Western aircraft firms, while a number of the engineers joined these companies to work on various missile projects. By the late 1940s a wide variety of missile projects were underway, from huge systems like the
Bell Bomi rocket-powered bomber to small systems like air-to-air missiles. By the early 1950s, both the US Air Force and
Royal Air Force had started major IR seeker missile projects. It did not receive official funding until 1951 when the effort was mature enough to show to Admiral
William "Deak" Parsons, the Deputy Chief of the
Bureau of Ordnance (BuOrd). It subsequently received designation as a program in 1952. Originally called the
Sidewinder 1, the first live firing was on 3 September 1952. The missile intercepted a drone for the first time on 11 September 1953. The missile carried out 51 guided flights in 1954, and in 1955 production was authorized. In 1954, the US Air Force carried out trials with the original
AIM-9A and the improved
AIM-9B at the Holloman Air Development Center. The first operational use of the missile was by
Grumman F9F-8 Cougars and
FJ-3 Furies of the United States Navy in the middle of 1956. The AIM-9A and AIM-9B were originally fitted with a non-propulsive attachment (NPA) for their MK 15 and MK 17 rocket motors. If the motor accidentally ignited while kept in storage, during transport, or while it was fitted to the aircraft hardpoints, the NPA would direct the exhaust gases at right angles rather than straight back. In these cases, the missile would not move. While the NPA safety device itself suffered no failures, some ordnance men forgot to remove them after hanging the missiles in the hardpoints. When the pilots attempted to fire the missiles in flight, the hot exhaust gases were redirected directly towards the wings, severely damaging the aircraft. After losing three aircraft in this manner, the US Navy withdrew the NPA from use.
AIM-9B (AAM-N-7 Sidewinder IA) (USAF/USN) test-firing an AIM-9 Sidewinder against a
QF-80 target drone at
Eglin Air Force Base The AIM-9B is very similar to the AIM-9A, but the "B" has a more sophisticated rear and more aerodynamical front fins. The AIM-9B is a very limited weapon, but it had no serious competitors and counters when it was introduced, causing it to be adopted by the USAF and NATO as a standard weapon, with around 80,000 units being produced from 1958 to 1962.
AIM-9D derivatives ATM-9D (USN): AIM-9D used for captive flight target acquisition training.
AIM-9H derivatives ATM-9H: Was a training version of the AIM-9H for captive flight target acquisition. The AIM-9J was an upgrade to the AIM-9E. It included: • The partial replacement of old-fashioned tube electronics with solid-state electronics. • A longer-burning gas generator, which increased flight time to 40 seconds. • More powerful actuators, driving new square-tipped double-delta canards. This doubled the single-plane "g" capability. Around 6,700 AIM-9Js were built from 1972 onward. These were mostly converted existing AIM-9B/E missiles.
AIM-9J variants AIM-9J: The base variant.
AIM-9J-1 (AIM-9N): AIM-9J-1 (later redesignated the AIM-9N) was an upgrade to the AIM-9J. The AIM-9N had a similar missile configuration to the AIM-9J, but the three main circuit boards were substantially redesigned to help improve seeker performance. Around 7,000 of the AIM-9N were built/rebuilt.
AIM-9J-3: AIM-9J-1 with the new SR116 motor.
AIM-9P The AIM-9P Sidewinder missile was a USAF sponsored family of export missiles based on the AIM-9J/N, and would be upgraded multiple times over its lifespan. The AIM-9P was an improved AIM-9J with a new motor, fuze and better reliability. It included a greater engagement range, allowing it to be launched farther from the target. The AIM-9P was more maneuverable than the AIM-9J, and also included improved solid-state electronics that increased reliability and maintainability. The AIM-9P was either a rebuilt B/E or J or all-new production. Deliveries of the AIM-9P began in 1978.
AIM-9P Variants AIM-9P: The base model.
AIM-9P-1: Introduced the DSU-15/B AOTD laser proximity fuze, replacing the previous infrared influence fuze with an active optical target detector.
AIM-9P-2: Includes a reduced-smoke rocket motor.
AIM-9P-3: Includes a reduced-smoke motor, an active optical target detector, an improved guidance and control section, mechanical strengthening to the warhead, guidance system and control section, and a new insensitive munitions warhead. The warhead uses a new explosive material, this explosive material is less sensitive to high temperature and has a longer shelf life.
AIM-9P-4: Introduced the ALASCA features and technology found on the AIM-9L/M variants.
AIM-9P-5: Added improved IRCCM from the AIM-9M.
AIM-9P derivatives RB24J: Swedish designation for the AIM-9P-3 Note: the speed of the B model was around 1.7 Mach and the other models above 2.5.
Later generation all-aspect variants AIM-9L (USAF/USN) warhead and
rocket motor, for training purposes. The next major advance in IR Sidewinder development was the
AIM-9L (
"Lima") model which was in full production in 1977. This was the first "
all-aspect" Sidewinder with the ability to attack from all directions, including head-on, which had a dramatic effect on close-in combat tactics. Its first combat use was by a pair of US Navy
F-14s in the
Gulf of Sidra in 1981 versus two Libyan
Sukhoi Su-22s, both of the latter being destroyed by AIM-9Ls. Its first use in a large-scale conflict was by the United Kingdom during the 1982
Falklands War. In this campaign the "Lima" reportedly achieved kills from 80% of launches, a dramatic improvement over the 10–15% levels of earlier versions, scoring 17 kills and 2 shared kills against Argentine aircraft.
AIM-9L Derivatives DATM-9L (USAF/USN): This is an AIM-9L used to train ground personnel in missile assembly, disassembly, loading, transportation, and storage procedures and techniques. •
AIM-9M-1 (USN): The AIM-9M-1 has very little information other than it uses the same Guidance Control System (GCS) as the AIM-9M-3. •
AIM-9M-2: No information other than the confirmation of its existence. •
AIM-9M-3 (USN): The only information regarding the AIM-9M-3 is that it uses the same GCS as the AIM-9M-1. •
AIM-9M-4 (USN): AIM-9M variant used by United States Navy, using a different GCS, other information on them is currently unknown. •
AIM-9M-5: No information other than the confirmation of its existence. •
AIM-9M-6 (USN): AIM-9M variant used by United States Navy using a different GCS, other information on them is currently unknown. •
AIM-9M-7: Variant modified for Operation Desert Storm/Shield to combat expected threats better. The nature of the upgrade is unknown.
AIM-9M Derivatives •
AIM-9Q (USN): The AIM-9Q is an AIM-9M modified with upgraded guidance-control section, further information on the missile is unknown and it was either cancelled or became an AIM-9M sub-variant. The surfaces may be permanently "clipped", or may fold out when the missile is launched.
AIM-9X (USAF/USN) F/A-18C Hornet in 2004
Hughes Electronics was awarded a contract for development of the
AIM-9X Sidewinder in 1996 after a competition against
Raytheon for the next short-range aerial combat missile, though Raytheon purchased the defense portions of Hughes Electronics the following year. The AIM-9X entered service in November 2003 with the USAF (the lead platform was the
F-15C) and the USN (the lead platform was the
F/A-18C) and is a substantial upgrade to the Sidewinder family featuring an
imaging infrared 128×128 element
focal-plane array (FPA) seeker with claimed 90° off-boresight capability, compatibility with
helmet-mounted displays such as the new U.S.
Joint Helmet Mounted Cueing System (JHMCS), and a totally new two-axis thrust-vectoring control (TVC) system providing increased turn capability over traditional control surfaces (60
g). Using the JHMCS, a pilot can point the AIM-9X missile's seeker and "lock on" by simply looking at a target, thereby increasing air combat effectiveness. It retains the same rocket motor, fuze and warhead of the AIM-9M, but its lower drag gives it improved range and speed. The AIM-9X also includes an internal cooling system, eliminating the need to use launch-rail nitrogen bottles (U.S. Navy and Marines) or internal argon bottles (USAF). It also features an electronic safe and arm device similar to the AMRAAM, allowing for a reduction in minimum range, and reprogrammable infrared
Counter Counter Measures (IRCCM) capability that coupled with the FPA provides improved look down into clutter and performance against the latest
IRCM. Though not part of the original requirement, the AIM-9X demonstrated potential for
lock-on after launch capability, allowing for possible internal use for the
F-35 Lightning II,
F-22 Raptor and even in a submarine-launched configuration for use against ASW platforms. The AIM-9X has been tested for a surface attack capability, with mixed results.
Block II Testing work on the AIM-9X Block II version began in September 2008. The Block II adds lock-on after launch capability with a datalink, so the missile can be launched first and then directed to its target afterwards by an aircraft with the proper equipment for 360-degree engagements, such as the F-35 or the F-22. By January 2013, the AIM-9X Block II was about halfway through its operational testing and performing better than expected.
NAVAIR reported that the missile was exceeding performance requirements in all areas, including lock-on after launch (LOAL). One area where the Block II needs improvement is helmetless high off-boresight (HHOBS) performance. It is functioning well on the missile, but performance is below that of the Block I AIM-9X. The HHOBS deficiency does not impact any other Block II capabilities, and is planned to be improved upon by a software clean-up build. Objectives of the operational test were due to be completed by the third quarter of 2013. However, as of May 2014 there have been plans to resume operational testing and evaluation (including surface-to-air missile system compatibility). , Raytheon had delivered 5,000 AIM-9X missiles to the armed services. On 18 June 2017, after an AIM-9X did not successfully track a targeted
Syrian Air Force Su-22 Fitter, US Navy Lt. Cmdr. Michael "Mob" Tremel flying a F/A-18E Super Hornet used an
AMRAAM AAM to successfully destroy the enemy aircraft. There is a theory that the Sidewinder is tested against American and not Soviet/Russian flares. The Sidewinder is used to rejecting American but not Soviet/Russian flares. Similar issues arose from the testing of the AIM-9P model. The missile would ignore American flares but go for Soviet ones due to their "different burn time, intensity and separation."
Block III In September 2012, Raytheon was ordered to continue developing the Sidewinder into a Block III variant, even though the Block II had not yet entered service. The USN projected that the new missile would have a 60 percent longer range, modern components to replace old ones, and an
insensitive munitions warhead, which is more stable and less likely to detonate by accident, making it safer for ground crews. The need for the AIM-9 to have an increased range was caused by
digital radio frequency memory (DRFM)
jammers that can blind the onboard radar of an
AIM-120D AMRAAM, so the Sidewinder Block III's passive imaging
infrared homing guidance system was seen as a useful alternative. Although it could supplement the AMRAAM for beyond visual range (BVR) engagements, it would still be capable of performing within visual range (WVR). Modifying the AIM-9X was seen as a cost-effective alternative to developing a new missile in a time of declining budgets. To achieve the range increase, the rocket motor would have a combination of increased performance and missile power management. The Block III would "leverage" the Block II's guidance unit and electronics, including the AMRAAM-derived datalink. The Block III was scheduled to achieve initial operational capability (IOC) in 2022, following the increased number of
F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighters to enter service. The Navy pressed for this upgrade in response to a projected threat which analysts have speculated will be due to the difficulty of targeting upcoming Chinese
fifth-generation jet fighters (
Chengdu J-20,
Shenyang J-31) with the radar-guided AMRAAM, specifically that Chinese advances in electronics will mean Chinese fighters will use their
AESA radars as jammers to degrade the AIM-120's kill probability. However, the Navy's FY 2016 budget canceled the AIM-9X Block III as they cut down buys of the F-35C, as it was primarily intended to permit the fighter to carry six BVR missiles; the insensitive munition warhead will be retained for the AIM-9X program. == Combat ==