As suggested in the original description by Myers (2010), the
phylogenetic analysis performed by Andres & Myers (2013) recovered
A. byrdi as closely related to
Pteranodon and the Nyctosauridae.
A. byrdi and
nyctosaurids were recovered as successive sister groups to the
Pteranodontoidea, of which
Pteranodon is defined to be the most
basal taxon. Although the clade name
Pteranodontia usually applies to the clade exclusively formed by pteranodontids and nyctosaurids, it was originally converted by Unwin (2003) to include
Pteranodon and
Nyctosaurus so under their phylogeny it contains also the
Ornithocheirae and other taxa. Therefore,
A. byrdi was classified as a non-pteranodontoid pteranodontian, and its
sister taxon relationship with
Pteranodontoidea warranted the erection of a new genus and species for this material. Below is a
cladogram based on the study upheld by Andres and Myers in 2013, showing the phylogenetic placement of
A. byrdi within the clade Pteranodontia. }} }} However, subsequent phylogenetic analyses placed
Alamodactylus as a pteranodontian outside
Nyctosauridae. ==See also==