Strumia's research specialization is in
physics beyond the Standard Model. He is one of the originators of the idea of Minimal Flavor Violation, a proposal to characterize the effects of flavor transitions in new theories of
particle physics. In 2004, together with
Riccardo Barbieri, Alex Pomarol and
Riccardo Rattazzi, Alessandro Strumia laid out a conceptually clear and practically useful framework for the analysis of the combined electroweak precision data of the low- and high-energy phases of the
LEP experiments. After the
OPERA experiment reported an observation of
neutrinos apparently traveling faster than light, Strumia in collaboration with
Gian Giudice and Sergey Sibiryakov showed that
superluminal neutrinos would imply some anomalies in the velocities of
electrons and
muons as a result of quantum-mechanical effects. Such anomalies could be already ruled out from existing data on cosmic rays, thus contradicting the OPERA results. After the discovery of the
Higgs boson, he computed the probability that the Higgs vacuum undergoes
quantum tunnelling, finding that the
universe is in a critical state which will eventually end in a cosmic collapse. He joined the
European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN)'s theory division as a fellow in 2000, Along with
Joseph Lykken and other collaborators, he later proposed the "modified naturalness" hypothesis for the Higgs boson's mass. While at CERN in June 2018, Strumia and Riccardo Torre worked on a new set of algorithms with which to evaluate the impact of published scientific research. Basing their investigation on
PageRank used by
Google, they proposed a similar system of ranking scientific papers and authors. Researchers had "mixed reaction", suggesting that it would be useful for "lifetime achievement" but possibly subject to "transparency issues". The "simplicity" of current methods of evaluation allows for
gaming the system. The difference in Strumia and Torre's approach is that they include what they describe as "second-generation" and later-generation citations in their algorithms. Therefore, not only the original citations of the work are taken into account, but subsequent citations to derivative material also. They named their systems
PaperRank and
AuthorRank. They also proposed a system called
CitationCoin to reduce the effect of groups who "inflate" each other citation count. == Controversies ==