Molecular clock Wilson joined the
UC Berkeley faculty of biochemistry in 1964, and was promoted to full professor in 1972. With his student
Vincent Sarich, he showed that
evolutionary relationships of the human
species with other
primates, in particular the
great apes (
humans,
chimpanzees,
gorillas and
orangutans), could be inferred from molecular evidence obtained from living species, rather than solely from
fossils of extinct creatures. Their microcomplement fixation method (see
complement system) measured the strength of the
immune reaction between an
antigen (
serum albumin) from one species and an
antibody raised against the same antigen in another species. The strength of the antibody-antigen reaction was known to be stronger between more closely related species: their innovation was to measure it quantitatively among many species pairs as an "
immunological distance". When these distances were plotted against the divergence times of species pair with well-established evolutionary histories, the data showed that the molecular difference increased linearly with time, in what was termed a "molecular clock". Given this calibration curve, the time of divergence between species pairs with unknown or uncertain fossil histories could be inferred. Most controversially, their data suggested that divergence times between humans, chimpanzees, and gorillas were on the order of 3~5 million years, far less than the estimates of 9~30 million years accepted by conventional
paleoanthropologists from fossil
hominids such as
Ramapithecus. This 'recent origin' theory of human/
ape divergence remained controversial until the discovery of the "
Lucy" fossils, in 1974, definitively dated in 1992 as between 3.22 and 3.18 million years.
Protein phylogeny Wilson and another PhD student
Mary-Claire King subsequently compared several lines of genetic evidence (immunology,
amino acid differences, and
protein electrophoresis) on the divergence of humans and chimpanzees, and showed that all methods agreed that the two species were >99% similar. Given the large organismal differences between the two species in the absence of large genetic differences, King and Wilson proposed that it was not structural gene differences that were responsible for species differences, but
gene regulation of those differences, that is, the timing and manner in which near-identical gene products are assembled during
embryology and
development. In combination with the "molecular clock" hypothesis, this contrasted sharply with the accepted view that larger or smaller organismal differences were due to large or smaller amounts of genetic divergence.
Mitochondrial Eve In the early 1980s, Wilson further disturbed and refined traditional anthropological thinking by his work with PhD students Rebecca Cann and Mark Stoneking on the so-called "Mitochondrial Eve" hypothesis. In his efforts to identify informative
genetic markers for tracking human evolutionary history, he focused on
mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) –
genes that are found in
mitochondria organelles in the
cytoplasm of the
cell outside the
nucleus. Because of its location in the cytoplasm, mtDNA is passed exclusively from mother to child, the father making no contribution, and in the absence of
genetic recombination defines female lineages over evolutionary timescales. Because it also
mutates rapidly, it is possible to measure the small genetic differences among individual within species and between closely related species by
restriction endonuclease gene mapping. Wilson, Cann, and Stoneking measured differences among many individuals from different human continental groups, and found that humans from Africa showed the greatest inter-individual differences, consistent with an African origin of the human species (the
Recent African origin of modern humans or "Out of Africa" hypothesis). The data further indicated that all living humans shared a common maternal ancestor, who lived in Africa only a few hundreds of thousands of years ago. This common ancestor became widely known in the media and popular culture as the Mitochondrial Eve. This had the unfortunate and erroneous implication that only a single female lived at that time, when in fact the occurrence of a
coalescent ancestor is a necessary consequence of
population genetic theory, and the Mitochondrial Eve would have been only one of many humans (male and female) alive at that time. This finding was, like his earlier results, not readily accepted by anthropologists. The conventional hypothesis had been that various human continental groups had evolved from diverse ancestors, over several millions of years since divergence from chimpanzees. The mtDNA data, however, strongly support the alternative and now generally accepted hypothesis, that all humans descend relatively recently from a common, relatively small African population. ==Death and legacy==