Cronbach's alpha

In his initial 1951 publication, Lee Cronbach described the coefficient as Coefficient alpha Coefficient alpha had been used implicitly in previous studies, but his interpretation was thought to be more intuitively attractive relative to previous studies and it became quite popular. • In 1967, Melvin Novick and Charles Lewis proved that it was equal to reliability if the true scores of the compared tests or measures vary by a constant, which is independent of the people measured. In this case, the tests or measurements were said to be "essentially tau-equivalent." • In 1978, Cronbach asserted that the reason the initial 1951 publication was widely cited was "mostly because [he] put a brand name on a common-place coefficient." He explained that he had originally planned to name other types of reliability coefficients, such as those used in inter-rater reliability and test-retest reliability, after consecutive Greek letters (i.e., \beta, \gamma, etc.), but later changed his mind. • Later, in 2004, Cronbach and Richard Shavelson encouraged readers to use generalizability theory rather than \alpha. Cronbach opposed the use of the name "Cronbach's alpha" and explicitly denied the existence of studies that had published the general formula of KR-20 before Cronbach's 1951 publication of the same name. ==Prerequisites for using Cronbach's alpha==

To use Cronbach's alpha as an accurate estimate of reliability, the following conditions must be met: • The "parts" (i.e. items, test parts, etc.) must be essentially tau-equivalent; • Errors in the measurements are independent. However, under the definition of CTT, the errors are defined to be independent. This is often a source of confusion for users who might consider some aspect of the testing process to be an "error" (rater biases, examinee collusion, self-report faking). Anything that increases the covariance among the parts will contribute to greater true score variance. Under such circumstances, alpha is likely to over-estimate the reliability intended by the user. ==Formula and calculation==

Reliability can be defined as one minus the error score variance divided by the observed score variance: \rho_{XX'} = \left(1 - {\sigma^2_E \over \sigma^2_X} \right) Cronbach's alpha is best understood as a direct estimate of this definitional formula with error score variance estimated as the sum of the variances of each "part" (e.g., items or testlets): : \alpha = {k \bar c \over \bar v + (k - 1) \bar c} where: • \bar v represents the average variance • \bar c represents the average inter-item covariance (or the average covariance of "parts"). ==Common misconceptions==

Application of Cronbach's alpha is not always straightforward and can give rise to common misconceptions. A high value of Cronbach's alpha indicates homogeneity between the items Many textbooks refer to \alpha as an indicator of homogeneity between items. This misconception stems from the inaccurate explanation of Cronbach (1951) See counterexamples below. \alpha=0.72 in the uni-dimensional data above. \alpha=0.72 in the multidimensional data above. The above data have \alpha=0.9692, but are multidimensional. The above data have \alpha=0.4, but are uni-dimensional. Uni-dimensionality is a prerequisite for \alpha. One should check uni-dimensionality before calculating \alpha rather than calculating \alpha to check uni-dimensionality. A high value of Cronbach's alpha indicates internal consistency The term "internal consistency" is commonly used in the reliability literature, but its meaning is not clearly defined. The term is sometimes used to refer to a certain kind of reliability (e.g., internal consistency reliability), but it is unclear exactly which reliability coefficients are included here, in addition to \alpha. Cronbach (1951) It may also reduce population-level reliability. The elimination of less-reliable items should be based not only on a statistical basis but also on a theoretical and logical basis. It is also recommended that the whole sample be divided into two and cross-validated. ==Notes==