In 1606 the prince-archbishop Wolf Dietrich von Raitenau built a palace for his mistress,
Salome Alt and their children outside the Bergstraßtor gate of Salzburg. The exact reason for building the palace was an attack of gout that the archbishop had suffered during the winter of 1604/1605, and a stroke that paralysed his right arm fr four months. Following his recovery, he had this pleasure-palace built for himself and his family to escape the crowded city. The extent of how much Wolf Dietrich enjoyed living in his new home is evident from a plaque inscribed in Latin, and brought by Markus Sittikus to the
Salzburg Residenz: The palace was built on a small, raised alluvial fan 200 metres north of the city wall, and is said to have been completed in six months. At around 400 square meters, it was not particularly large. The name Altenau was derived from Salome Alt's family name, and the term
Au, referring to a low island in the river
Salzach which at the time had a very broad bed, stretching from the
Mönchsberg wall of the city as far as the area of the present Schwarzstraße (embankments were not added to the river until after 1852). Because other plots in the area were too close to the
floodplain of the Salzach, the Alt family already owned four herb-gardens on the raised area. A chronicler describes the building as a large and magnificent palace or castle, surrounded by beautiful gardens of all kinds of shrubs, trees and fruit. The interior of the palace also impressed the chronicler, who states: '' "The very finest that one could imagine, exuberant wealth, the most beautiful women's clothes, the most beautiful jewels made of beautiful gold, precious stones and pearls - as though in a king's palace" ''. The palace was a favourite residence of the prince-archbishop and his family, who '' 'in this beautiful building often relaxed with his own, and often spent both evenings and mornings enjoying mealtimes, and enjoying all manner of honest pleasures and entertainments' ''. The reference to honest pleasures is a particularly interesting indication that the archbishop's relationship to the family of his mistress was seen as legitimate. == Subsequent history ==