Background In early April 2015, the Sweden Democrats (SD) accused its youth league, the
Sweden Democrat Youth (SDU), of having relations with the
far-right and
ethnonationalist organization () which had been founded by members of the
National Democrats, an
ethnopluralist breakaway group from the SD. The SDU had also encountered repeated controversies of its members being accused of making racist statements. In response to these alleged relations, SD threatened to expel several leading members of SDU unless the league moderated itself. SDU's leader Gustav Kasselstrand, and its deputy leader William Hahne, were eventually expelled from the party on 27 April 2015. They both denied the accusations of relations with extremist groups, and claimed that SD's parliamentary group leader
Mattias Karlsson wanted to get rid of them after Hahne defeated the leadership's preferred candidate for the chairmanship of SDU in Stockholm. Following the initial expulsion of the youth wing's chairman and deputy chairman, the mother party launched its own leadership candidate to compete against
Jessica Ohlson, who was considered an ally of Kasselstrand and Hahne and deemed too radical by the SD for a leadership position. The SD warned that the party would break all ties with SDU if Ohlson were to be elected chairman. On 12 September 2015, Ohlson defeated the party's preferred candidate for the SDU chairmanship, and the party shut down SDU's website and broke all relations with its youth wing. It then established a new youth organization,
Young Swedes () and produced a timetable that every SD member who remained a member of SDU should leave the league or risk expulsion from the mother party. Ohlson herself was officially expelled alongside five other SDU members on 25 October, but continued to serve as chairman of SDU, which went on to become an independent organization.
Founding and defections In early 2017,
Sveriges Radio reported that SDU members had filed a party registration application to the
election authority. The party was eventually registered on 13 December 2017, with Kasselstrand, Hahne and Ohlson in central positions. It was then officially launched on 5 March 2018; at the same time, it announced that it would participate in the 2018 elections. At the time of the launch, the party was described as drawing inspiration from
Alternative for Germany, the
Freedom Party of Austria and the French
National Rally. Two Sweden Democrat members of the
Riksdag,
Olle Felten and
Jeff Ahl, defected to the party later that month. According to the rules of the
Riksdag, Felten and Ahl are considered independent MP's, meaning that Alternative for Sweden is not officially represented in the parliament.
Mikael Jansson, former leader of the Sweden Democrats, also defected on 9 April, citing the mother party's recent lack of resistance to
NATO as his main reason. Before the 2018 elections, the party was one of the largest in terms of social media interactions and expected to enter the parliament after the elections, with leader Gustav Kasselstrand asking people on Twitter to prepare for "Sweden's biggest political earthquake in modern times". However, the party failed to enter parliament by a large margin, receiving just 0.31 out of the 4.0 percent needed to get past the
election threshold. On election night, the party was reported to have been kicked out of the
Persian restaurant it had rented to celebrate the election results. According to high-level officials at Facebook, AfS social media interactions were reviewed just before the 2018 election. Accused of using bots to manipulate the algorithm and inflate the party's perceived popularity, actions were taken by Facebook to limit certain activities of AfS accounts just before the election. It did not participate in the municipal elections.
Since 2018 After the 2018 election, the party participated in the
2019 election for the European Parliament, but failed to gain a seat. In March 2020, the party's deputy chairman and founding member William Hahne resigned from his position, after he had been revealed by to run a webshop selling surgical masks for a price 759% higher than other commercial sellers of surgical masks during the
COVID-19 pandemic. == Ideology and policies ==