Israeli officials and the
Anti-Defamation League reacted by stating that political and academic debates should not be mixed and accused the ASA of discrimination against Israel and "Orwellian
antisemitism",
David Lloyd and
Colin Dayan. The Israeli ambassador to the US,
Ron Dermer, stated, "Rather than standing up for academic freedom and human rights by boycotting countries where professors are imprisoned for their views, the A.S.A. chooses as its first ever boycott to boycott Israel, the sole democracy in the Middle East, in which academics are free to say what they want, write what they want and research what they want."
UCLA professor
Robin D. G. Kelley argued that such statements “grossly mischaracterized” the ASA resolution “as an assault on academic freedom. On the contrary, it is one of the most significant affirmative acts any scholarly organization has proposed in defense of academic freedom since the anti-apartheid movement. Palestinian students and faculty living under occupation do not enjoy academic freedom, let alone the full range of basic human rights.” Senior administrators at over 200 universities have rejected the academic boycott of Israel and four universities have withdrawn from the organization:
Brandeis University,
Indiana University,
Kenyon College, and
Penn State Harrisburg.
MIT President
L. Rafael Reif,
Wesleyan University President
Michael S. Roth,
Bard College President
Leon Botstein,
Boston University president
Robert A. Brown, Oberlin College President Marvin Krislov, and
Harvard University President
Drew Gilpin Faust. The
Association of American Universities, the
American Association of University Professors, and the
American Council on Education have all publicly denounced the boycott as a violation of the academic freedom of not only Israeli but also US scholars as well. The
AMCHA Initiative maintains an updated list of universities that have terminated their ASA membership, and a list of universities that reject the boycott. Some politicians have expressed criticism through
open letters and legislation. Democratic Congressman
Eliot Engel sent a letter to the ASA's president in which he criticized "the unfair double standard Israel is regularly and unfairly subjected to by organizations such as yours." In January 2014, 134 members of
Congress (69 Democrats, 65 Republicans) signed a letter to ASA president Curtis Marez and president-elect Lisa Duggan, which accused the ASA of engaging in a "morally dishonest double standard." The letter stated that: "Like all democracies, Israel is not perfect. But to single out Israel, while leaving relationships with universities in autocratic and repressive countries intact, suggests thinly-veiled bigotry and bias." Lawmakers in New York described the ASA boycott as "targeted discrimination against Israel that betrays the values of academic freedom that we hold dear." In January 2014, they put forward an
anti-BDS law that would have banned universities and colleges from funding organizations that "have undertaken an official action boycotting certain countries or their higher education institutions." But the proposed law faced sharp criticism over its implications on free speech and was discarded. Individual academics and commentators have sharply criticized the boycott through
editorials and
op-eds.
George Mason University professor
David Bernstein, described the ASA as having moved from, "the ordinary lunatic fringe" into "the racist lunatic fringe," and
Stanley N. Katz of
Princeton University questioned the practical effect of the resolution, stating that the ASA "lacks any formal ties with Israeli institutions in the first place." In a January 2015 speech to
Columbia Law School's Center for Law and Liberty, former
Harvard University President
Lawrence Summers said that in response to the ASA boycott, "universities should make clear that their names cannot be invoked as the purported sponsor for conferences or dialogues in which the primary thrust is demonization of Israel.... And it goes without saying that they should not allow themselves to be used as economic leverage against Israel." Eight past ASA presidents have signed a letter which described the boycott as "antithetical to the mission of free and open inquiry for which a scholarly organization stands." The letter also criticized the fact that “ASA Members were provided only the resolution and a link to a website supporting it. Despite explicit requests, the National Council refused to circulate or post to the ASA’s website alternative perspectives." == Response from the ASA ==