The earliest written record of the Peierls transition was presented at the 1954
École de physique des Houches. These lecture notes (shown below) contain Rudolf Peierls' handwritten equations and figures, and can be viewed in the library of the
Institut Laue–Langevin, in
Grenoble,
France. Peierls' discovery gained experimental backing during the effort to find new superconducting materials. In 1964, Dr. William Little of the
Stanford University Department of Physics theorized that a certain class of polymer chains may experience a high
Tc superconducting transition. The basis for his assertion was that the lattice distortions that lead to pairing of electrons in the
BCS theory of
superconductivity could be replaced instead by rearranging the electron density in a series of side chains. This means that now electrons would be responsible for creating the
Cooper pairs instead of ions. Because the transition temperature is inversely proportional to the square root of the mass of the charged particle responsible for the distortions, the
Tc should be improved by a corresponding factor: : \frac{T}{T_i} = \sqrt{\frac{M_i}{m_e}}. The subscript
i represents "ion", while
e represents "electron". The predicted benefit in superconducting transition temperature was therefore a factor of about 300. In the 1970s, various organic materials such as
TTF-TCNQ were synthesized. What was found is that these materials underwent an insulating transition rather than a superconducting one. Eventually it was realized that these were the first experimental observations of the Peierls transition. With the introduction of new band gaps after the lattice becomes distorted, electrons must overcome this new energy barrier in order to become free to conduct. The simple model of the Peierls distortion as a rearrangement of ions in a 1-D chain could describe why these materials became insulators rather than superconductors. == Related physical consequences ==