According to a 2006
United Nations study, the livestock industry sector emerges as one of the top two or three most significant contributors to the most serious environmental problems, at every scale from local to global." As such, using plant-derived foods is typically considered better for the interests of the environment. Despite this, the raising of certain animals can be more
environmentally sound than others. According to the Farralones Institute's report from 1976, raising
rabbits, and
chickens (on a well-considered approach) for food can still be quite sustainable. As such, the production of meat and other produce, such as eggs, may still be considered environmentally friendly (if this is done in an industrial, high-efficiency manner). In addition, raising
goats (for goat milk and meat) can also be environmentally quite friendly and has been favored by certain
environmental activists, such as
Mahatma Gandhi. The
planetary diet of the EAT-Lancet commission has advised substantial reductions in consumption of ASF on the basis that these diets threaten sustainability because of their
environmental footprint and negative health impacts. This report was challenged by Adegbola T. Adesogan and colleagues in 2020 who stated that it "fail[ed] to adequately include the experience of marginalized women and children in low- and middle-income countries whose diets regularly lack the necessary nutrients" and ASF offer the best source of nutrient rich food for children aged 6–23 months. Between 1990–2018, global intakes (servings per week) increased for
processed meat, unprocessed
red meat, cheese, eggs, milk and seafood. ==Health effects==