Leeward Capital Corp, a small Canadian mining firm, began exporting amber from Myanmar during the 1990s, resulting in the description of a number of fossil species from the deposit. During the late 2000s, Burmese amber production began to increase as a result of the exhaustion of Chinese amber mines and greater trade between Myanmar and China in general, with the amber trade being initially unaffected by the outbreak of renewed conflict between the
Kachin Independence Army, an armed rebel group seeking to scede from Myanmar, and the Burmese armed forces (
Tatmadaw) in 2011. Despite the conflict between them, there was apparently a tacit agreement between the two groups to keep the amber trade flowing, with the KIA controlling the mines, while the Tatmadaw controlled their export to China, with both collecting taxes on the trade. In 2016, the KIA took full control of the amber mines, and controlled amber export via "various licenses, taxes, restrictions on the movement of labor and enforced auctions". In June 2017 the
Tatmadaw seized control of the mines from the KIA. The main amber market in Myanmar is
Myitkyina. Most Burmese amber is exported (primarily smuggled) into China, with the primary Chinese market being in
Tengchong,
Yunnan, with an estimated 100 tonnes of Burmese amber passing into the city in 2015, with a then estimated value between five and seven billion
yuan, where it is primarily used for jewelry. Burmese amber was estimated to make up 30% of Tenchong's gemstone market (the rest being
Myanmar Jade), and was declared one of the city's eight main industries by the local government. The presence of calcite veins are a major factor in determining the gem quality of pieces, with pieces with a large number of veins having significantly lower value. Interest in this discussion rose in March 2020 after the highly publicised description of
Oculudentavis, which made the cover of
Nature. On April 21, 2020, the
Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (SVP) published a letter of recommendation to journal editors asking for "a moratorium on publication for any fossil specimens purchased from sources in Myanmar after June 2017 when the Myanmar military began its campaign to seize control of the amber mining". On April 23, 2020
Acta Palaeontologica Polonica stated that it would not accept papers on Burmese amber material collected from 2017 onwards, after the Burmese military took control of the deposit, requiring "certification or other demonstrable evidence, that they were acquired before the date both legally and ethically". On May 13, 2020, the
Journal of Systematic Palaeontology published an editorial stating that it would no longer consider papers based whole or in part on Burmese amber material, regardless of whether in historic collections or not. On 30 June 2020, a statement from the International Palaeoentomological Society was published in response to the SVP, criticising the proposal to ban publishing on Burmese amber material. In August 2020, a comment from over 50 authors was published in
PalZ responding to the SVP statement. The authors disagreed with the proposal of a moratorium, describing the focus on the Burmese amber as "arbitrary" and that "The SVP's recommendation for a moratorium on Burmese amber affects fossil non-vertebrate research much more than fossil vertebrate research and clearly does not represent this part of the palaeontological community." The conclusion that Burmese amber funded the Tatmadaw was disputed by
George Poinar and Sieghard Ellenberger, who found that the supply of amber collapsed after the 2017 takeover of the mines by the Tatmadaw, and that most of the current circulation of amber in Chinese markets was extracted prior to 2017. A story in
Science in 2019 stated: "Two former mine owners, speaking through an interpreter in phone interviews, say taxes have been even steeper since government troops took control of the area. Both shut their mines when they became unprofitable after the government takeover, and almost all deep mines are now out of business, dealers here corroborate. Only shallow mines and perhaps a few secret operations are still running." There were around 200,000 miners working in the Hukawng valley mines prior to the takeover by the Tatmadaw, which shrunk to 20,000 or less after the military operations.
Adolf Peretti, a gemologist who owns a museum with Burmese amber specimens, noted that the 2017 cutoff suggested by the SVP does not take into account that the export of Burmese amber prior to 2017 was also funding internal conflict in Myanmar due to the control by the KIA. Much of the amber cutting since 2017 has been done in
internally displaced person camps, under humanitarian and non-conflict conditions. == Other Burmese ambers ==