Antiphon (orator)

Early life Antiphon was born around 480 and from an old wealthy family from the deme Rhamnus. Though Pseudo-Plutarch says he was born at the time of Persian wars in Live of the Ten Orators, Ostwald believed the date of Antiphon’s birth is inconsistent with the age when he began publishing his speeches, which is about sixty, and his involvement in the oligarchic revolution, which is about seventy. Therefore, he would lower Antiphon’s date of birth by a decade, which is 470. But scholars generally accepted the year of 480. Antiphon’s father, Sophilus, was a Sophist who owned a school. So scholars consider he learned the skills of public speaking from his father. While Plutarch also mentioned he pursued the career of a teacher in his early days, some historians expected him to take over his father’s school when he grew up. In addition to his sophist father, the political climate in his childhood fostered his interest in political and legal affairs. The institution of Athenian democracy was established around 450 or later, and Antiphon observed the development of democracy closely in his childhood. As a result, no speaker considered composing their speech for someone else or preparing it beforehand. Or even if there were written speeches, they failed to withstand the stringent requirements of Athenian or critical taste. Writing speeches was, therefore, a bold idea that was controversial at the time. Antiphon became the first to write forensic speeches for publication. He was well-known for his love of money, as declared by Plato in his Peisandros. And the Archidamian War had left his family in poverty, so he looked for an additional occupation of composing speeches. Antiphon acquired enough reputation to start his logographic business, fragments of his lost speeches revealed that Antiphon traveled far and had a wide range of acquaintances, including the general Demosthenes and Alcibiades as clients. There were arguments about whether he was the first logographer in Greece, there is no doubt that he was the first to write speeches for money. Death Antiphon was active in political affairs in Athens, and, as a zealous supporter of the oligarchical party, was largely responsible for the establishment of the Four Hundred in 411 (see Theramenes). After the Athenians were defeated by Sparta in Sicily in 413, Antiphon and a group of aristocrats staged a coup led by four hundred oligarchs in 411. But this government was overthrown quickly as its chief proponent, Phrynichus, was assassinated. Thucydides famously characterized Antiphon's skills, influence, and reputation: Antiphon was accused of treason and condemned to death. Given his inability to deny his obvious involvement in the coup, he might have continued by claiming that he wanted an enhanced democracy rather than an oligarchy. In the end, Antiphon’s plea failed, and he was executed. Some scholars believed the aim of his speech was not to succeed but to present and leave for future generations a deft piece of sophistry regarding his role in the collapse of democracy. Antiphon may be regarded as the founder of political oratory, but he never addressed the people himself except on the occasion of his trial. Fragments of his speech then, delivered in defense of his policy (called ) have been edited by J. Nicole (1907) from an Egyptian papyrus. == Works ==

The accurate number of Antiphon’s works is vague as many of those are lost in antiquity. Callimachus cataloged his works together with other orators in the library at Alexandria. Caecilius declared that twenty-five of Antiphon’s sixty speeches were spurious, as his judgments were based on chronological and stylistic criteria[5], other scholars might not agree on his standards. We currently have fifteen speeches, including three sets of Tetralogies, each with four speeches—two for defense and two for prosecution—and three individual forensic speeches to be delivered in an Athens court. List of extant speeches This is a list of extant speeches by Antiphon: • Against the Stepmother for Poisoning () • The First Tetralogy: Anonymous Prosecution For Murder () • The Second Tetralogy: Prosecution for Accidental Homicide () • The Third Tetralogy: Prosecution for Murder Of One Who Pleads Self-Defense () • On the Murder of Herodes () • On the Choreutes () Authenticity of the Tetralogies As the Tetralogies have distinct historical, legal and stylistic features from the court speeches, many scholars had doubted its authenticity. Dittenberger asserts that the Tetralogies assumed a legal system that was very dissimilar from Athens', and the tactics and approaches used by litigants were incongruous. He scrutinized how they differed from Antiphon’s court speeches. According to him, they were exercises meant to teach young men how to argue in court rather than being written by Athenians for Athenians. He also debated the unusual occurrence of several apparent Ionicisms in the Tetralogies, which are primarily written in the Attic dialect. They interpret this as proof that Ionian Greeks lived in Athens. While Antiphon was an Athenian, he could not be the author. However, some other scholars suggested the Tetralogies are written speeches intended for a more scholarly audience rather than being delivered in court. Tetralogies are only works of fiction; their primary goal is not to persuade; rather, they concentrate on developing a smart and improbable argument that advances liberal education rather than professional training. Also, the format of opposing speeches allows Antiphon to match arguments against arguments in a way that was rare in actual speeches, so he could present the methods of argument and theoretical issues. This could not be presented in his court speeches, where the opponents might not always respond every point. Regarding the linguistic issue, the use of Ionicisms could not serve as evidence from another writer. The incorporation of Ionicisms indicates that the intended audience was not limited to Athenians but also included foreigners, even though the Tetralogies were among the first Attic written works that we have. At the period, the writers were not constrained by factors like their hometown to write in a single, constant dialect. Additionally, the sophists' spirit of experimentation and the intellectual pursuits of the second half of the fifth century BC were ideally suited to the Tetralogies' arguments. The work of the first rhetoricians, Coraz, Tisias, and Gorgias, can be compared to the First Tetralogy's arguments based on likelihood and the Second and Third Tetralogy's nexus of arguments about cause, effect, blame, and responsibility. They do fit well to the Athenian’s intellectual ideology at the time. There is no reason to reject the attribution of Tetralogies to Antiphon, despite the fact that there are still a number of loopholes in the evidence supporting its veracity. Therefore, a majority of scholars regard them as works of Antiphon. == Contribution ==

Antiphon’s practical and philosophical pursuits resulted in useful advice regarding litigation and forensic tactics, as well as creative intellectual studies in the dramatic format of trials, like the Tetralogies. Most significantly, his main contribution was writing forensic speeches for real-world applications, which became a significant cultural institution in fourth-century Greece and beyond. The great theoretical works of orators like Corax, Tisias, Gorgias, and others were turned into practical use and largely impacted the intellectual lives of many Athenians. Antiphon was the innovator of putting intellectual knowledge into legal use. == Notes ==