. While
Aquilolamna is thought to be an elasmobranch, its taxonomy is disputed as, despite the
holotype being a well-preserved body fossil, no teeth are known, which are important for determining the
taxonomic affinities of fossil sharks; they are thought to have been dislodged when the individual died, although they could be preserved deeper in the matrix. Potential skin impressions preserved with the fossil could potentially be just fossilized
bacterial mats. It was tentatively assigned to
Lamniformes in its original description based on some morphological similarities to other members of the family. However, due to its extremely unusual features, other paleontologists have reservations about classifying it as such, and future research may be required. It has also been suspected that
Aquilolamna may have been closely allied with
Cretomanta, an extinct
neoselachian of
uncertain taxonomic affinity described in 1990 from teeth found in
Texas (with further remains found in
Canada and
Colorado).
Cretomanta lived around the same time as
Aquilolamna and, given their possible similarities, both genera may belong to the same (unknown) family. == Description ==