,
Turners Falls,
Massachusetts Pre-lithification In the early 20th century, James Gardner hypothesized that these structures formed by the accumulation of fine clay particles as they flowed along a stream, gradually building up concentric rings of sediments by
adhesion until their weight eventually stopped them rolling with the current. That view held sway for some 20 years, despite an earlier suggestion in 1875 by
Jones and King that those mud balls found on
beaches had formed from broken off fragments of clay from adjacent cliffs which had then been rolled by wave action. By 1940 it was generally accepted that their formation was due to rolling of broken off fragments of clay and not to concretion. The particles, typically sand or pebbles, form an "armor" that allows the mud ball to retain its shape during transport. This is especially important for armored mud balls that form in deep-ocean sediment flows known as
turbidity currents, where fragments of mud initially eroded from
submarine canyons become coated with a sand armor that allows them to travel for tens of kilometers without being destroyed. Armored mud balls formed by wave action in beach environments can sometimes carry an armor of seashell fragments instead of pebbles.
Lithification Despite their name, armored mud balls are typically quite fragile and often disintegrate after drying out, making them a rare occurrence in the geologic record. However, if armored mud balls are buried quickly, there is a chance that they may become lithified along with their entombing sediment and get preserved for millions of years. The mud balls themselves are preserved as small chunks of mudstone or siltstone surrounded by a ring of pebbles. == Examples ==