Pliny the Elder and ancient precedents The earliest surviving writing on art that can be classified as art history are the passages in
Pliny the Elder's
Natural History (–79), concerning the development of
Greek sculpture and painting. From them it is possible to trace the ideas of
Xenokrates of Sicyon (), a Greek sculptor who was perhaps the first art historian. Pliny's work, while mainly an
encyclopaedia of the sciences, has thus been influential from the
Renaissance onwards. (Passages about techniques used by the painter
Apelles c. (332–329 BC), have been especially well-known.) Similar, though independent, developments occurred in the 6th century China, where a canon of worthy artists was established by writers in the scholar-official class. These writers, being necessarily proficient in calligraphy, were artists themselves. The artists are described in the
Six Principles of Painting formulated by
Xie He.
Vasari and artists' biographies ,
Self-portrait ,
Portrait of Johann Joachim Winckelmann, 1768|343x343px
Giorgio Vasari, a Tuscan painter, sculptor and author of the
Lives of the Most Excellent Painters, Sculptors, and Architects, has been credited with writing the first true
history of art. He emphasized art's progression and development, which was a milestone in this field. His work was a personal and a historical account, featuring biographies of individual Italian artists, many of whom were his contemporaries and personal acquaintances. The most renowned of these was
Michelangelo. Vasari's writings about art were enormously influential, and served as a model for many.
Winckelmann and art criticism Scholars such as
Johann Joachim Winckelmann (1717–1768) criticized Vasari's "cult" of artistic personality, and argued that the real emphasis in the study of art should be the views of the learned beholder and not the viewpoint of the artist. Winckelmann's writings thus were the beginnings of
art criticism. His two most notable works that introduced the concept of art criticism were
(Reflections on the Painting and Sculpture of the Greeks), published in 1755, and (
History of Art in Antiquity), published in 1764 (this is the first occurrence of the phrase 'history of art' in the title of a book). Winckelmann critiqued the artistic excesses of
Baroque and
Rococo forms, and was instrumental in reforming taste in favor of
Neoclassicism. Winckelmann's work marked the entry of art history into the high-philosophical discourse of
German culture. Winckelmann was read avidly by
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe and
Friedrich Schiller, both of whom began to write on the history of art, and his account of the
Laocoön group occasioned a response by
Lessing. The emergence of art as a major subject of philosophical speculation was solidified by the appearance of
Immanuel Kant's
Critique of Judgment in 1790, and was furthered by
Hegel's
Lectures on Aesthetics. Hegel's philosophy served as the direct inspiration for
Karl Schnaase's work. Schnaase's
Niederländische Briefe established the theoretical foundations for art history as an autonomous discipline, and his
Geschichte der bildenden Künste, one of the first historical surveys of the history of art from antiquity to the Renaissance, facilitated the teaching of art history in German-speaking universities. Schnaase's survey was published contemporaneously with a similar work by
Franz Theodor Kugler.
Wölfflin and stylistic analysis Heinrich Wölfflin (1864–1945), who studied under Burckhardt in Basel, is considered to be one of the most influential scholars of modern art history. He introduced a scientific approach to the history of art, focusing on three concepts. Firstly, he attempted to study art using psychology, particularly by applying the work of
Wilhelm Wundt. He argued, among other things, that art and architecture are good if they resemble the human body. For example, houses were good if their
façades looked like faces. Secondly, he introduced the idea of studying art through comparison. By comparing individual paintings to each other, he was able to make distinctions of style. His book
Renaissance and Baroque developed this idea, and was the first to show how these stylistic periods differed from one another. In contrast to
Giorgio Vasari, Wölfflin was uninterested in the biographies of artists. He proposed the creation of an "art history without names." He also studied art based on ideas of
nationhood. He was particularly interested in whether there was an inherently "
Italian" and an inherently "
German" style. This last interest was most fully articulated in his monograph on the German artist
Albrecht Dürer.
Riegl, Wickhoff, and the Vienna School In the late 19th century, a major school of art-historical thought developed at the
University of Vienna. The first generation of the Vienna School was dominated by
Alois Riegl and
Franz Wickhoff, both students of
Moritz Thausing, and was characterized by a tendency to reassess neglected or disparaged periods in the history of art. Riegl and Wickhoff both wrote extensively on the art of
late antiquity, which before them had been considered as a period of decline from the classical ideal. Riegl also contributed to the revaluation of the Baroque. The next generation of professors at Vienna included
Max Dvořák,
Julius von Schlosser, Hans Tietze, Karl Maria Swoboda, and
Josef Strzygowski. A number of the most important twentieth-century art historians, including
Ernst Gombrich, received their degrees at Vienna at this time. The term "Second Vienna School" (or "New Vienna School") usually refers to the following generation of Viennese scholars, including
Hans Sedlmayr, Otto Pächt, and Guido Kaschnitz von Weinberg. These scholars began in the 1930s to return to the work of the first generation, particularly to Riegl and his concept of
Kunstwollen, and attempted to develop it into a full-blown art-historical methodology. Sedlmayr, in particular, rejected the minute study of iconography, patronage, and other approaches grounded in historical context, preferring instead to concentrate on the aesthetic qualities of a work of art. As a result, the Second Vienna School gained a reputation for unrestrained and irresponsible
formalism. This latter tendency was, however, by no means shared by all members of the school; Pächt, for example, was himself Jewish, and was forced to leave Vienna in the 1930s.
Panofsky and iconography In 1920, a group of scholars gathered in
Hamburg to study Iconography. The most prominent among them were
Erwin Panofsky,
Aby Warburg,
Fritz Saxl and
Gertrud Bing. Together they developed much of the vocabulary that continues to be used in the 21st century by art historians. "Iconography"—with roots meaning "symbols from writing" refers to subject matter of art derived from written sources—especially scripture and mythology. "Iconology" is a broader term that referred to all symbolism, whether derived from a specific text or not. Today art historians sometimes use these terms interchangeably. Panofsky, in his early work, also developed the theories of Riegl, but became eventually more preoccupied with iconography, and in particular with the transmission of themes related to classical antiquity in the Middle Ages and Renaissance. In this respect his interests coincided with those of Warburg, the son of a wealthy family who had assembled a library in Hamburg, devoted to the study of the classical tradition in later art and culture. Under Saxl's auspices, this library was developed into a research institute, affiliated with the
University of Hamburg, where Panofsky taught. Warburg died in 1929, and in the 1930s Saxl and Panofsky, both Jewish, were forced to leave Hamburg. Saxl settled in London, bringing Warburg's library with him and establishing the
Warburg Institute. Panofsky settled in Princeton at the
Institute for Advanced Study. In this respect they were part of an extraordinary influx of German art historians into the English-speaking academy in the 1930s. These scholars were largely responsible for establishing art history as a legitimate field of study in the English-speaking world, and the influence of Panofsky's methodology, in particular, determined the course of American art history for a generation.
Marxism and the Frankfurt School By the Mid-20th Century, the ideas of
Marxism began to spread rapidly throughout Europe along with a further inquiry of the
history of art.
The Frankfurt School, using
critical theory, were influential figures in the advancement of studying art. Along with Marxists before the 1920s, such as
Georgi Plekhanov and
Friedrich Engels, using
historical materialism, to analyze the development of the arts within society. Within the Frankfurt School, philosopher
Walter Benjamin, wrote his 1935 essay "
The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction", in which Benjamin argued that an "aura" is found within artworks: its original presence in time and space. He suggests a work of art's aura is in a state of decay because it is becoming more and more difficult to apprehend the time and space in which a piece of art is created. Benjamin's theory closely relates to
Affect theory. Georgi Plekhanov is considered to be a pioneer in progressing the use of materialist thinking within the study of art. His work "Historical Materialism and the Arts" written in 1899, describes how historical materialism can be used against an
idealist conclusion of art to reach a clearer outlook on the topic. Marxists, like Plekhanov, argue that while artistic periods and revolutions obey their own logic, ultimately art is confined within the limits of the mode of production. Importantly, Marxists believe that the ideas in society, including art, are an expression of one or another of the contending classes existing in that mode of production. ==Professional organizations==