Diagnosing or identifying peripheral artery disease requires a history of symptoms and a physical exam, followed by confirmatory testing. An ABI range of 0.90 to 1.40 is considered normal. A person is considered to have PAD when the ABI is ≤ 0.90. However, PAD can be further graded as mild to moderate if the ABI is between 0.41 and 0.90, and severe if the ABI is less than 0.40. These categories can provide insight into the disease course. Individuals with noncompressible arteries have an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality within two years. Individuals with suspected PAD with normal ABIs can undergo exercise testing for ABI. A baseline ABI is obtained before exercise. The patient is then asked to exercise (usually patients are made to walk on a treadmill at a constant speed) until claudication pain occurs (for a maximum of 5 minutes), after which the ankle pressure is again measured. A decrease in ABI of 15%–20% would be diagnostic of PAD. As such, CT may be considered as an alternative to invasive angiography. An important distinction between the two is that, unlike invasive angiography, assessment of the arterial system with CT does not allow for vascular intervention.
Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is a noninvasive diagnostic procedure that uses a combination of a large magnet, radio frequencies, and a computer to produce detailed images of blood vessels inside the body. The advantages of MRA include its safety and ability to provide high-resolution, three-dimensional imaging of the entire abdomen, pelvis, and lower extremities in one sitting.
Classification The two most commonly used methods to classify peripheral artery disease are the Fontaine and Rutherford classification systems. The Fontaine stages were introduced by René Fontaine in 1954 to define the severity of chronic limb
ischemia: • Stage I: asymptomatic • Stage IIa: intermittent claudication after walking a distance of more than 200 meters • Stage IIb: intermittent claudication after walking a distance of less than 200 meters • Stage III: rest pain • Stage IV:
ulcers or
gangrene of the limb The Rutherford classification was created by the
Society for Vascular Surgery and the International Society of Cardiovascular Surgery, introduced in 1986 and revised in 1997 (and known as the Rutherford classification after the lead author,
Robert B. Rutherford). This classification system consists of four grades and seven categories (categories 0–6): • Grade 0, Category 0: asymptomatic • Grade I, Category 1: mild claudication • Grade I, Category 2: moderate claudication • Grade I, Category 3: severe claudication • Grade II, Category 4: rest pain • Grade III, Category 5: minor tissue loss; ischemic ulceration not exceeding the ulcer of the digits of the foot • Grade IV, Category 6: major tissue loss; severe ischemic ulcers or frank gangrene Moderate to severe PAD, classified by Fontaine's stages III to IV or Rutherford's categories 4 to 5, presents a limb threat (risk of limb loss) in the form of
critical limb ischemia. Recently, the
Society for Vascular Surgery came out with a classification system based on "wound, ischemia and foot infection" (WIfI). This classification system, published in 2013, was created to account for the demographic changes that have occurred over the past forty years, including the increased incidence of high blood sugar and evolving techniques and abilities for
revascularization. This system was created on the basis that ischemia and angiographic disease patterns are not the sole determinants of amputation risk. (ABI), although a systematic review of the literature did not support the use of routine ABI screening in asymptomatic patients. Testing for coronary artery disease or carotid artery disease is of unclear benefit. Some studies propose the development of devices measuring oxygen continuously during exercise. This is because resting perfusion and metabolic activity are extremely low, and differences between non-patients and PAD patients are barely measurable. As such, testing of vascular function and energetics requires a physiological challenge.
Pulse oximeters can be inconvenient to wear during exercise and only give oxygen values at discrete time points, nor is there sufficient evidence to support any use in identifying PAD. Some publications and studies therefore discuss the use of wearable sensors measuring oxygen levels continuously in PAD patients, such as through
transcutaneous means. However, because transcutaneous measurements are affected by movement (such as during exercise) and body temperature, the use of oxygen sensors that are inserted
subcutaneously as opposed to transcutaneously may most effectively help monitor a PAD patient's progress and direct therapy decisions. To date, one oxygen sensing system has been approved for use in Europe to measure tissue perfusion in all PAD patients. ==Treatment==