No non-invasive tests are currently able to diagnose articular cartilage damage. Additionally, symptoms vary considerably from person to person. Or as Dr. Karen Hambly stated:
MRI-scans are becoming more valuable in the analysis of articular cartilage but their use is still expensive and time-consuming.
X-rays show only bone injuries and are therefore not very helpful in diagnosing cartilage damage, especially not in early stages. The best tool for diagnosing articular damage is the use of
arthroscopy.
Measuring cartilage damage The International Cartilage Repair Society has set up an arthroscopic grading system by which cartilage defects can be ranked: • grade 0: (normal) healthy cartilage • grade 1: the cartilage has a soft spot, blisters, or superficial wear • grade 2: minor tears of less than one-half the thickness of the cartilage layer • grade 3: lesions have deep crevices of more than one-half the thickness of the cartilage layer • grade 4: the cartilage tear is full thickness and exposes the underlying (subchondral) bone Doctors will often also measure the size of each defect. Defects smaller than 2 cm2, for example, are considered to be small. It is also important to remember that although the amount of damage is an important factor, the location of the defect(s) can also influence the symptoms you are getting in terms of pain and function and their repair options available. ==Treatment==