Percussion In the 20th century, most fuzes were 'percussion'. They may be 'direct action' (also called 'point detonating' or 'super quick') or 'graze'. They may also offer a 'delay' option. Percussion fuzes remain widespread particularly for training. However, in the 19th century combined 'T&P' fuzes became common and this combination remain widespread with airburst fuzes in case the airburst function failed or was set too 'long'. War stocks in western armies are now predominantly 'multi-function' offering a choice of several ground and airburst functions.
Direct action Direct action fuzes function by the fuze nose hitting something reasonably solid, such as the ground, a building or a vehicle, and pushing a firing pin into a detonator. The early British fuze at left is an example. Direct action fuze designs are 'super-quick' but may have a delay option. 20th-century designs vary in the relative positions of their key elements. For example, the firing pin and detonator may be close to the nose with a long flash tube to the booster (typical in US designs), or there might instead be a long firing pin to a detonator close to the booster and a short flash tube (typical in British designs).
Graze Graze fuzes function when the shell is suddenly slowed down, e.g. by hitting the ground or going through a wall. This deceleration causes the firing pin to move forward or the detonator to move backward so that one strikes the other. Graze is the only percussion mechanism that can be used in base fuzes. Such a fuze is usually an inertially fired fuze (such as a base fuze mentioned above) that has special features to increase the chance of the fuze functioning if it hits the target at a highly oblique angle that can frequently jam or "blind" such fuzes due to the high sideways forces generated. For example, the later WWII German Navy armor-piercing projectile base fuzes ("Bodenzunder") had such fuzes of several kinds, with the weighted firing pin and the explosive detonator pellet both free to move, held apart only by friction or a light spring, after arming in flight by removing a series of rotating shutters locking them in place before firing the projectile. Thus, on a highly oblique – "glancing" or "grazing" – impact, there was a higher chance that at least one of them would be free to move toward the other and be thrown toward the other during the target impact with enough force to explode the detonator and start the shell explosive train. There are other design variations for this effect.
Delay Direct action fuzes can have a delay function, selected at the gun as an alternative to direct action. Delay may use a graze function or some other mechanism. Special 'concrete piercing' fuzes usually have only a delay function and a hardened and strengthened fuze nose.
Base Base fuzes are enclosed within the base of the shell and thus are not damaged by the initial impact with the target. Their delay timing may be adjustable before firing. They use graze action and have not been widely used with field artillery. Base fuzed shells were used by coast artillery and warships against armoured warships into the 1950s. They have also had some use against tanks, some such shells having
High Explosive Squash Head (HESH) features, also called High Explosive Plastic (HEP), which were used after World War II by 105mm artillery for self-defence by and against tanks.
Airburst Airburst fuzes, using a preset timing device initiated by the gun firing, were the earliest type of fuze. They were particularly important in the 19th and early 20th centuries when shrapnel fuzes were widely used. They again became important when cluster munitions became a major element in Cold War ammunition stocks. The use of multi-function fuzes in the late 20th century meant that in some western countries airburst fuzes became available for every shell. Time fuzes were essential for larger calibre anti-aircraft guns, and it soon became clear that igniferous fuzes were insufficiently accurate. This drove the development of mechanical time fuzes between the world wars. During World War 2 radio proximity fuzes were introduced, initially for use against aircraft, where they proved far superior to mechanical time, and at the end of 1944 for field artillery.
Time using the
Thiel mechanism, circa 1936 s Artillery
Time fuzes detonate after a set period of time. Early time fuzes were igniferous (i.e. combustible) using a powder train. Clockwork mechanisms appeared at the beginning of the 20th century and electronic time fuzes appeared in the 1980s, soon after digital watches. Almost all artillery time fuzes are fitted to the nose of the shell. One exception was the 1950s design US nuclear shell (M422) that had a triple-deck mechanical time base fuze. The time delay of a time fuze is usually calculated as part of the technical fire control calculations, and not done at the gun although armies have differed in their arrangements. The fuze delay primarily reflects the range to the target and the required height of burst. High height of burst, typically a few hundred metres, is usually used with
star shell (illuminating shell) and other base ejecting shells such as smoke and cluster munitions, and for observing with high-explosive (HE) shells in some circumstances. Low airburst fuzes, typically about , were used with HE shells. The height of burst with shrapnel depended on the angle of descent, but for optimal use it was a few tens of metres. Igniferous time fuzes had a powder ring in an inverted 'U' metal channel, the fuze being set by rotating the upper part of the fuze. When the shell was fired the shock of firing set back a detonator onto a firing pin, which ignited the powder ring; when the burn reached the fuze setting, it flashed through a hole into the fuze magazine, which then ignited the bursting charge in the shell. If the shell contained HE then the fuze had a gaine that converted the powder explosion into a detonation powerful enough to detonate the HE. The problem with igniferous fuzes was that, though good enough for flat trajectory shrapnel (ranges were relatively short by later standards) or high bursting carrier shells, they were imprecise and erratic. While improvements in powder composition helped, several complex factors still prevented the desired regularity in the field. Britain in particular encountered great difficulty in achieving consistency early in World War I (1914 and 1915) with its then-obsolescent gunpowder-train time fuzes for anti-aircraft fire against targets at altitudes up to . It was then discovered that standard gunpowder burned differently at differing altitudes, a problem rectified to some extent by specially designed fuzes with modified gunpowder formulations. Britain finally switched to mechanical (i.e. clockwork) time fuzes just after World War I, which solved this problem. Residual stocks of igniferous fuzes lasted for many years after World War 2 with smoke and illuminating shells. Before World War I
Krupp, in Germany, started producing the Baker clockwork fuze. It contained a spring clock with an extra-rapid cylinder escapement giving 30 beats per second. During World War 1 Germany developed other mechanical time (i.e. clockwork) fuzes. These were less erratic and more precise than igniferous fuzes, critical characteristics as gun ranges increased. Between the wars five or six different mechanisms were developed in various nations. However, three came to predominate, the Thiel pattern in British designs, Junghans pattern in American designs and the Swiss Dixi mechanisms, the first two having originated in World War 1 Germany. Mechanical time fuzes remain in service with many armies. Mechanical time fuzes were good enough for field artillery to achieve the effective HE height of burst of about 10 metres above the ground. However, 'good enough' usually meant '4 in the air and 2 on the ground'. This fuze length was extremely difficult to predict, so the height of burst almost always had to be adjusted by observation.
Proximity for an
artillery shell, circa 1945 The benefits of a fuze that functioned when it detected a target in proximity are obvious, particularly for use against aircraft. The first such fuze seems to have been developed by the British in the 1930s for use with their anti-aircraft 'unrotated projectiles' – rockets. These used a photo-electric fuze. During 1940–42 a private venture initiative by
Pye Ltd, a leading British wireless manufacturer, worked on the development of a radio proximity fuze. Pye's research was transferred to the United States as part of the technology package delivered by the
Tizard Mission when the United States entered the war. These fuzes emitted radio waves and sensed their reflection from the target (aircraft or ground). The strength of the reflected signal indicated the distance to the target. When this was correct the fuze detonated. For the first 18 months or so proximity fuzes were restricted to anti-aircraft use to ensure that none was retrieved by the enemy and copied. They were also called 'variable time' or VT to obscure their nature. They were finally released for field artillery use in December 1944 in Europe. While they were not perfect and bursts could still be erratic due to rain, they were a vast improvement on mechanical time in delivering a very high proportion of bursts at the required 10 metre height. However, VT fuzes went far deeper into the shell than other fuzes because they had a battery that was activated by the shock of firing. This meant the fuze recess had to be deeper, so to enable shorter non-VT fuzes the deep recess was filled with removable supplementary HE canisters. After the war the next generation of proximity fuze included a mechanical timer to switch on the fuze a few seconds before it was due at the target. These were called 'Controlled Variable Time' (CVT) and reduced the incidence of early bursts. Later models had additional electronic countermeasures.
Distance measuring The mechanical distance fuze has had little use; Thompson's pattern was tested by the British but did not enter service. The fuzes operated by counting revolutions. It has the advantage of inherent safety and not requiring any internal driving force but depended on muzzle velocity and rifling pitch. These are allowed for when calculating the fuze setting. Early 20th-century versions were sometimes called 'flag fuzes', so named due to the vane protruding from the nose of the fuze.
Electronic timer In the late 1970s and early '80s electronic time fuzes started replacing earlier types. These were based on the use of oscillating crystals that had been adopted for digital watches. Like watches, advances in electronics made them much cheaper than mechanical devices. The introduction of these fuzes coincided with the widespread adoption of cluster munitions in some NATO countries.
Multi function A fuze assembly may include more than one fuze function. A typical combination would be a T&P ("Time & Percussion") fuze with the fuze set to detonate on impact or expiration of a preset time, whichever occurred first. Such fuzes were introduced around the middle of the 19th century. This combination may function as a safety measure or as an expedient to ensure that the shell will be actuated no matter what happens and hence not be wasted. The United States called mechanical T&P fuzes 'mechanical time super quick' (MTSQ). T&P fuzes were normal with shrapnel and HE shells (including proximity fuzes), but were not always used with high bursting carrier shells. However, in the early 1980s electronic fuzes with several functions and options started appearing. Initially they were little more than enhanced versions of proximity fuzes, typically offering a choice of proximity heights or impact options. A choice of burst heights could also be used to get optimum burst heights in terrain with different reflectivity. However, they were cheaper than older proximity fuzes and the cost of adding electronic functions was marginal, so they were more widely issued. In some countries all their war stock HE was fitted with them, instead of only 5% to 10% with proximity fuzes. The most modern multi-option artillery fuzes offer a comprehensive choice of functions. For example, Junghans DM84U provides delay, super quick, time (up to 199 seconds), two proximity heights of burst and five depths of foliage penetration.
Sensor Sensor fuzes can be considered smart proximity fuzes. Initial developments were the United States 'Seek and Destroy Armour' (SADARM) in the 1980s using sub-munitions ejected from a carrier shell. Later European developments, BONUS and
SMArt 155, are calibre due to advances in electronics. These sensor fuzes typically use millimetric radar to recognise a tank, aim the sub-munition at it, and fire an explosively formed penetrator from above.
Course correcting The main fuze developments in the early 21st century are near-precision course-correcting fuzes (CCF), replacing the standard multi-option nose fuze with a package adding
GPS-guided trajectory correction. The cost is much lower than true
precision-guided artillery munitions, making them suitable for widespread use. An example is the
M1156 precision guidance kit, which improves the accuracy of shells fivefold at maximum range (
CEP vs CEP). ==Settings==