Past and current geographical distribution The known distribution of
A. tetramera has always been small. Past distribution includes only the counties of Martin and Palm Beach in Florida, USA.
Pawpaw Preserve, Palm Beach County's smallest natural area, was established largely due to the presence of several examples of
A. tetramera.
Major threats There are two primary threats to
A. tetramera and its habitat: human-induced habitat loss or modification and the reduction of wildfire occurrences. It was officially listed on September 26, 1986, and its protection under the ESA went into effect on October 27, 1986. The original report proposing
A. tetramera endangerment status argued that the species "is threatened by destruction of its habitat or commercial and residential construction, and by successional changes in habitat". It mentions that the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution was ordered through the ESA to make reports on plant species that may be threatened or endangered. Although
A. tetramera was included in the report (in 1975), its proposal to be labeled an endangered species "expired" before it could be approved. Reasons given for why the four-petal pawpaw should be listed as endangered include: • (A) Active destruction and disturbance of its habitat/range, • (D) Inadequate regulation practices, especially in terms of habitat protection, and • (E) Other threats, such as lack of wildfires to promote sprouting and reproduction. Sections B and C (overutilization and disease/predation) were not considered as threats to
A. tetramera. Under the ESA, the four-petal pawpaw is protected through rules that protect its critical habitat, the prevention of any activity that would harm the plant or its habitat, the creation of conservation/restoration plans, and funding for such actions.
Five-year reviews Despite the four-petal pawpaw becoming an endangered species under the ESA in 1986, there have only been three official 5-year reviews for the species: 1991, 2009, and 2022. Each of the first two reviews present no change in status for
A. tetramera (the species remains endangered) The most recent five-year review of
Asimina tetramera was released by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) in January 2022. It reports a decrease in the total number of populations. In 2009, there were 16 populations on 21 different sites, but only 9 different populations on 14 different sites in 2021. Of the 9 remaining populations, around half are believed to be increasing or stable. This means the remaining half of the populations are declining. The total estimated number of remaining individuals is 1,400. This is lower than the estimated number reported in 2009, at 1,800 individuals. A chart is provided in the 2022 five-year review which outlines all the sites where four-petal pawpaw populations have been identified. The largest populations are in Jonathan Dickinson State Park (495 individuals in 2006 and "100s" in 2021), Juno Dunes Natural Area South (335 in 2018/2021), and Juno Dunes Natural Area North (302 in 2016). These larger populations all occur on protected land (i.e. state parks). In regard to threats, the 2022 review identifies continued human development as the biggest threat to
A. tetramera habitat. It predicts that habitat loss due to development and land clearing will continue to increase, especially due to human population growth in Martin and Palm Beach Counties, Florida. Other threats listed include inadequate regulations, low reproductive rates, invasive species, and herbicides used against invasive species. It is unclear if climate change effects will impact
A. tetramera populations. However, these factors are considered potential threats. Included in climate-change-related potential threats are sea level rise, increased average temperature, changes in precipitation patterns, and more frequent or intense hurricanes. The degree of potential harm of these factors on
A. tetramera is varied. Sea level rise is identified as having a high potential for negative impact on
A. tetramera because it could cause direct loss of the plants coastal habitat. Recommendations by the 2022 five-year review for continued management of the four-petal pawpaw include introducing more individuals in protected areas with appropriate habitat conditions. Previous attempts of this practice have not been very successful. The USFWS suggests more research into habitat requirements to increase success rates of this form of management. To address direct
habitat destruction, the USFWS argues for increasing resources for habitat maintenance and restoration efforts. The 2022 review also provides "recommendations for future activities", which fall into three categories: Recovery Activities, Research/Monitoring, and Outreach/Collaboration. Recovery Activities include collecting
A. tetramera seeds for "
ex situ" safeguarding, continuing propagation, identifying suitable habitat for introduction, prescribed burns, and careful invasive species management. Research and monitoring recommendations consist of surveying for suitable habitat, continuing (and expanding) monitoring of populations, studying associated pollinators, and analyzing the impacts of climate change on the species. Proposed outreach and collaboration activities include partnering county, state, and federal agencies in research and conservation practices, publicizing information about the species and its conservation (i.e. through media), and engaging youth and volunteers in conservation and monitoring projects.
Species Status Assessment There is currently no Species Status Assessment available for
Asimina tetramera (as of 2022).
Recovery Plan The four-petal pawpaw's current recovery plan is laid out under the South Florida Multi-Species Recovery Plan (MSRP), which was issued on May 18, 1999. The plan was most recently amended in September 2019. In the South Florida MSRP,
A. tetramera was included amongst 8 mammals species, 13 bird species, 10 reptile species, 2 invertebrate species, and 34 other plant species. The two primary recommended recovery actions are prescribed (controlled) burning and protection of remaining habitat. Prescribed burns and biomass reduction (cutting back plants) are currently a management technique used in Jonathan Dickinson State Park. Numerous species-level recovery actions are presented by the USFWF under the Recovery Plan. The plan suggests continuously surveying the two counties where
A. tetramera has been identified. The goal is to record any changes in population trends and species range. Previously unknown sites or sub-populations may be found as surveys continue. Another plan is creating and maintaining a Geographic Information Systems (GIS) database of
A. tetramera. The database would contain information on plant locations, plant/population status, and population sizes. This would allow for convenient visualization of changing trends in four-petal pawpaw populations. Other plans include protecting existing populations, using "local or regional planning to protect habitat", and continuing research on life history characteristics. "Ex situ", or "off site", conservation is also mentioned as a recovery action. In this approach, the plants are grown in controlled conditions, including greenhouses or protected areas. By having some controlled four-petal pawpaw plants, seed can be collected and genetic diversity can be maintained. The plan also makes note of the importance of enforcing protective measures. Taking, removing, or intentionally damaging the plant is banned. According to the Recovery Plan, offenders of such actions should be punished.
2019 Recovery Plan amendment The recovery plan was amended in 2019. The amendment added delisting criteria for the four-petal pawpaw because the original plan only included "downlisting" criteria. Delisting guidelines act as a set of goals from which conservation plans can be made. By abiding by these goals, the chance of A. tetramerea populations surviving and/or growing is increased. The delisting criteria includes: • At least 25 populations are stable or growing • The populations meeting the first criterion are within the habitat of historical range (sand pine scrub). • There are conservation or management practices in place that ensure the habitat remains, allowing for the growth of pawpaw populations to continue or remain steady. This amendment also mentions that the population declines of
A. tetramera may have caused a loss in
genetic diversity. This raises another point of concern because
genetic diversity loss makes it easier for populations to be wiped out by major events (i.e.
hurricanes,
disease outbreak). Management practices are emphasized as an important recovery plan. It specifically mentions controlled burning, controlling non-native or invasive species, and restoring the scrub pine habitats as was to work towards
A. tetramera recovery. ==References==