Marx adopts the concept of sublation from Hegel to describe the historical development of material conditions, however, reinterprets it through a
materialist framework. While Hegel understood sublation as the self-realization of (often translated as "mind" or "spirit") and as an ideal, universal spirit manifesting through history, Marx inverted this approach (as he explicitly says in
Capital), grounding dialectical development in concrete, socio-economic contradictions, particularly those between
classes. Although Marx acknowledged a “rational kernel” in
Hegel’s dialectics, he rejected the notion that Geist could account for historical change in the materialist sense, arguing instead that it mystified real social relations by abstracting them from their class-based foundations. Thus, for Marx, historical development reflects the movement of material contradictions, not the ideal agency of spirit, and cannot be reduced to the unfolding of a universal mind. == See also ==