In ancient Rome the
auguria (augural rites) were considered to be in equilibrium with the
sacra ("sacred things" or "rites") and were not the only way by which the gods made their will known. The
augures publici (public augurs) concerned themselves only with matters related to the state. The role of the augur was that of consulting and interpreting the will of gods about some course of action such as accession of kings to the throne, of magistrates and major
sacerdotes to their functions (
inauguration) and all public enterprises. It sufficed to say that the augur or magistrate had heard a clap of thunder to suspend the convocation of the
comitia.
Ancient tradition According to Varro, before his time augures had distinguished five kinds of territory: ager Romanus, ager Gabinus, ager peregrinus, ager hosticus, ager incertus. These distinctions clearly point to the times of the prehistory of Latium and testify the archaic quality of the art of augury. The
jus augurale (augural law) was rigorously secret, therefore very little about the technical aspects of ceremonies and rituals has been recorded. We have only the names of some
auguria: • The
augurium salutis took place once a year, before the magistrates and the people, in which the gods were asked whether it was auspicious to ask to for the welfare of the Romans, • The
augurium canarium required the sacrifice of red dogs and took place after wheat grains had formed and before they were shelled. The terms
augurium and
auspicium are used indifferently by ancient authors. Modern scholars have debated the issue at length but have failed to find a distinctive definition that may hold for all the known cases. By such considerations Dumezil thinks that the two terms refer in fact to two aspects of the same religious act: •
auspicium would design the technical process of the operation, i.e.
aves spicere, looking at the birds; •
augurium would be the resulting interpretation i.e. the determination, acknowledgement of the presence of the
*auges, the action favoured by the god(s), the intention and the final product of the whole operation. In Varro's words "
Agere augurium, aves specit", "to conduct the
augurium, he observed the birds".
Categories The auspicia were divided into two categories: requested by man (
impetrativa) and offered spontaneously by the gods (
oblativa). Both
impetrativa and
oblativa auspices could be further divided into five subclasses: • ex caelo (
thunder,
lightning) • ex avibus (birds) • ex tripudiis (attitude to food, and feeding manner of Mars' sacred chickens) • ex quadrupedibus (
dog,
horse,
wolf, and
fox) • ex diris (ominous events). Only some species of birds (
aves augurales) could yield valid signs whose meaning would vary according to the species. Among them were
ravens,
woodpeckers,
owls,
ossifragae, and
eagles. Signs from birds were divided into
alites, from the flight, and
oscines, from the voice: The
alites included region of the sky, height and type of flight, behaviour of the bird and place where it would come to rest. The
oscines included the pitch and direction of the sound.
Ritual Magistrates endowed by the law with the right of
spectio (observation of auspices) would establish the requested
auspicium (observation platform) before taking the
auspicia impetrativa ("requested" or "sought" auspices; see above). The
templum, or sacred space within which the operation would take place had to be established and delimited (it should be square and have only one entrance) and purified (
effari,
liberare). The enunciation of the requested auspicia that began the observation portion of the ceremony was called
legum dictio. Observation conditions were rigorous and required absolute silence for validity of the operation. Technically the sky was divided into four sections or regions:
dextera,
sinistra,
antica, and
postica (right, left, anterior and posterior). The prototype of the ritual of inauguration of people is described in Livy's description of the inauguration of king
Numa Pompilius:The augur asks Jupiter: "
Si fas est" (i.e. if it is divine justice to do this) "... send me a certain
signum (sign)" then the augur listed the
auspicia he wanted to see. When they appeared Numa was declared king.
Precedence Since the observation was complex, conflict among signs was common. A hierarchy among signs was devised: e.g. a sign from the eagle would prevail on that from the woodpecker and the ossifragae (parra). During the last centuries of the republic the auspices
ex caelo and
ex tripudiis supplanted other types, as the other forms could be easily used in a fraudulent way, i.e. bent to suit the desire of the asking person. Cicero condemned the fraudulent use and denounced the decline in the level of knowledge of the doctrine by the augurs of his time, but in fact the abuse developed from the evasion of negative signs, described in the next subsection.
Evasion The interpretation of signs was vast and complex, and magistrates devised protective tricks to avoid being paralysed by negative signs. Against the negative
auspicia oblativa the admitted procedures included: • actively avoiding seeing them •
repudiare – refuse them through an interpretative sleight of hand •
non observare – by assuming one had not paid attention to them • declaring something that in fact had not appeared •
tempestas – choosing the time of the observation at one's will •
renuntiatio – making a distinction between observation and formulation •
vitia – resorting to acknowledging the presence of mistakes • repeating the whole procedure. ==Attus Navius==