Australia received mixed reviews from critics. , the film holds a 53% approval rating on review aggregator
Rotten Tomatoes, based on 216 reviews with an average rating of 6.10/10. The site's critical consensus reads, "Built on lavish vistas and impeccable production,
Australia is unfortunately burdened with thinly drawn characters and a lack of originality." At
Metacritic, which assigns a
normalised rating to reviews, the film has a weighted average score of 53 out of 100, based on 38 critics, indicating "mixed or average" reviews. Audiences polled by
CinemaScore gave the film an average grade of "A-" on an A+ to F scale.
Australian critics Jim Schembri in
The Sydney Morning Herald and
The Age (Melbourne) wrote, "The film is fine, and never boring but, boy, is it overlong," and added, "More importantly, local films with black themes or major indigenous characters tend to do poorly, so if
Australia succeeds here it could represent a breakthrough. We've always had trouble dealing with racial issues on film, so, in that regard, the film could be a landmark." Claire Sutherland, in her review for the
Herald Sun (Melbourne) wrote, "A love letter to the Australian landscape and our history,
Australia has international blockbuster written all over it", and Sydney's
The Daily Telegraph wrote, "Kidman's screen presence is nothing short of radiant." In his review for
The Australian (Sydney), David Stratton wrote, "It's not the masterpiece that we were hoping for, but I think you could say that it's a very good film in many ways. While it will be very popular with many people I think there's a slight air of disappointment after it all. Despite its flaws – and it certainly has flaws – I think
Australia is an impressive and important film." Mark Naglazas of
The West Australian (Perth) accused positive reviews from
News Ltd press outlets of being manipulated by 20th Century Fox, as they were all owned by
Rupert Murdoch's
News Corporation at the time, calling
Australia a film of "unrelenting awfulness" that "lurches drunkenly from crazy comedy to
Mills and Boonish melodrama in the space of a couple of scenes".
British critics Anne Barrowclough of
The Times (London) gave the film four out of five stars, and states the film defies expectation and "in what turns out to be a multi-layered story it describes an Australia of the 1940s that is at once compellingly beautiful and breathtakingly cruel". Bonnie Malkin of
The Daily Telegraph (London) stated: "Local critics had worried that the much-anticipated film
Australia would present to the world a series of time-honoured
Antipodean clichés. Their fears were well founded".
U.S. critics Megan Lehmann, writing in the
Hollywood Reporter, said that the film "defies all but the most cynical not to get carried away by the force of its grandiose imagery and storytelling," and it is "much less earnest than the trailer suggests, layered with a thin veneer of camp and a nod and a wink to accompany the requisite Aussie clichés," and the bottom line is "In epic style, Baz Luhrmann weaves his wizardry on Oz."
Roger Ebert gave the film three stars out of four, noting "Baz Luhrmann dreamed of making the Australian
Gone with the Wind, and so he has, with much of that film's lush epic beauty and some of the same awkwardness with a national legacy of racism."
David Ansen, in his review for
Newsweek, wrote, "Kidman seems to blossom under Luhrmann's direction: she's funny, warm and charming, and the erotic charge between her and the gruff, hunky Jackman is delicious. In a solemn season,
Australia bold, kitschy, unapologetic artifice is a welcome respite." In her review for the
New York Times,
Manohla Dargis wrote, "This creation story about modern Australia is a testament to movie love at its most devout, cinematic spectacle at its most extreme, and kitsch as an act of aesthetic communion."
Andrew Sarris, in his review for the
New York Observer, wrote, "
Australia is clearly a labor of love, and a matter of national pride. It is also a bit of a mess. I must confess that I might have been harder on Mr Luhrmann's film if I had not remained entranced by Ms. Kidman ever since I first saw her in
Phillip Noyce's
Dead Calm in 1989; in my opinion, she has lost none of her luster in the 20 years since." In his review for
Time,
Richard Schickel wrote, "Have you seen everything
Australia has on offer a dozen times before? Sure you have. It's a movie less created by director and co-writer Baz Luhrmann than assembled, Dr Frankenstein-style, from the leftover body parts of earlier movies. Which leaves us asking this question: How come it is so damnably entertaining?"
Joe Morgenstern of the
Wall Street Journal, opines that, "In its heart of hearts
Australia is an old-fashioned
Western—a Northern, if you will—and all the more enjoyable for it." Nick Rogers, of FilmYap, adds that, "Luhrmann mythologized his homeland as American directors like
John Ford did with Westerns—dramatic-license exaggerations that pay off in droves."
Ann Hornaday, in her review for the
Washington Post, wrote, "A wildly ambitious, luridly indulgent spectacle of romance, action, melodrama and revisionism,
Australia is windy, overblown, utterly preposterous and insanely entertaining." In her review for
Salon.com,
Stephanie Zacharek wrote, "The second half of
Australia, Luhrmann's attempt to pull off a wartime weeper, is so aggressively sentimental that it begins to feel more like punishment than pleasure. I left
Australia feeling drained and weakened, as if I'd suffered a gradual poisoning at the hands of a mad scientist." ==Box office and home media sales==