Autism and disability researchers and writers have criticized the ideology for potentially reinforcing broader societal discrimination and exclusion. Many noted correlations between autism supremacy and other supremacist ideologies such as
eugenics and
scientific racism, engrained in common underlying patterns of hierarchical thinking. For
Virginia Tech disability researcher Paul Heilker, who cited the existence of Aspie supremacism in 2012, the ideology was originally an attempt to define an autistic identity specifically by whiteness. Autism researchers Sara Acevedo and Suzanne Stoltz linked the movement to the "misuses of neurodiversity", and argued that it has its roots in
white supremacist ideology,
colonialism, and
capitalist systems that "reinforces the archetype of the productive,
neoliberal citizen". Sociological and disability studies researchers claimed that the movement fails to justify the ideas it defends on a factual basis. Hooge and Jacky (Manidoomakwakwe) Ellis expressed that the idea of a category of autistic people superior to others is not based on any objective medical basis, due to the notions of "
high-functioning" and "
low-functioning" autism being dynamic social categories, and not factual and fixed medical categories. == Manifestations ==