General
biocides such as copper, Junction, or ZeroTol offer a potential solution to bacterial wilt of turf grass; however, such chemical control agents must be applied after every mowing which may be economically impractical and ultimately
phytotoxic. If bacterial wilt is present of the golf course, the best option may be to designate a mower for use on infected greens only in order to prevent the spread of the pathogen to other greens. Other viable methods include simply limiting the number of wounds the plant incurs, thereby limiting entry sites for the pathogen. A simple example would be less frequent mowing. It has also been proven that the disease is most devastating in grass cut to a length of between 1/8 and 3/16 of an inch, but less so in grass over 1/4 of an inch in length or longer, which presents an additional argument for limiting mowing. Another example is limiting sand topdressing as this is also a very abrasive technique which can create small wounds which allow entry of bacteria into the plant. A 1987 study found evidence of a possible
biocontrol strategy for bacterial wilt of turf grass. The researchers found that
antiserum to
Pseudomonas fluorescens or
Erwinia herbicola from hosts which have survived infections by the corresponding pathogens is capable of reducing wilt symptoms in turf grass caused by
Xanthomonas translucens. The researchers did note, however, that while it is important to ensure the presence of a higher number of competing bacterial cells in order to reduce symptoms, one should take care to avoid over-infecting the host with a new bacterial pathogen. Further gains towards host resistance were made in 2001 when researchers found that
inoculation of
meadow fescue during breeding with a single aggressive strain of the bacterial wilt pathogen greatly increased resistance in offspring, thereby demonstrating the potential of
selective breeding to reduce bacterial wilt
pathogenesis on turf and rye grasses. == Importance ==