, . During his extensive travels, Acton spent much time in the chief intellectual centres of Europe, reading the correspondence of historical personalities. Acton's stance on the Confederacy was shared by most English Catholics at the time, both liberal and
Ultramontane. The editors of the Ultramontane
Tablet denounced
Abraham Lincoln as a dangerous radical, and
John Henry Newman, when asked for his opinion on the matter, stated that slavery was not "intrinsically evil" and that the issue had to be assessed on a case-by-case basis. The two were intimate friends and frequent correspondents. Gladstone was particularly concerned to elevate Acton's standing as he headed out to Rome to resist the Pope's plan to have Papal Infallibility confirmed at the Vatican Council. Both Acton and Gladstone opposed this scheme and it was thought that, if Acton were a British Peer, it would strengthen his position in Rome.
Matthew Arnold said: "Gladstone influences all round him but Acton; it is Acton who influences Gladstone." Acton was appointed to the
Royal Victorian Order as a Knight Commander (KCVO) in the 1897 Birthday Honours. He was also a strong supporter of
Irish Home Rule.
Religion and writings and
William Gladstone, 1879. Meanwhile, Acton became the editor of the Roman Catholic monthly paper,
The Rambler, in 1859, upon
John Henry (later Cardinal) Newman's retirement from the editorship. In 1862, he merged this periodical into the
Home and Foreign Review. Though a sincere Roman Catholic, his spirit as a historian was hostile to ultramontane pretensions, and his independence of thought and liberalism soon brought him into conflict with the church hierarchy. As early as August 1862, Cardinal
Wiseman publicly censured the
Review; and when in 1864, after
Döllinger's appeal at the Munich Congress for a less hostile attitude towards historical criticism, the pope issued a declaration that the opinions of Catholic writers were subject to the authority of the Roman congregations, Acton felt that there was only one way of reconciling his literary conscience with his ecclesiastical loyalty, and he stopped the publication of his monthly periodical. He continued, however, to contribute articles to the
North British Review, which, previously a Scottish
Free Church organ, had been acquired by friends in sympathy with him, and which for some years (until 1872, when it ceased publication) promoted the interests of a high-class Liberalism in both temporal and ecclesiastical matters. Acton also did a good deal of lecturing on historical subjects. In the March 1862
Rambler, Acton wrote: And: "Subjection to a people of a higher capacity for government is of itself no misfortune; and it is to most countries the condition of their political advancement." In 1870, along with his mentor
Döllinger, Acton opposed the moves to promulgate the
doctrine of
papal infallibility in the
First Vatican Council, travelling to Rome to lobby against it, ultimately unsuccessfully. Acton did not become an
Old Catholic, and continued attending Mass regularly; he received the
last rites on his deathbed. The Catholic Church did not try to force his hand. It was in this context that, in a letter he wrote to scholar and ecclesiastic
Mandell Creighton, dated April 1887, Acton made his most famous pronouncement: But if we might discuss this point until we found that we nearly agreed, and if we do agree thoroughly about the impropriety of
Carlylese denunciations and
Pharisaism in history, I cannot accept your canon that we are to judge Pope and King unlike other men, with a favourable presumption that they did no wrong. If there is any presumption it is the other way, against the holders of power, increasing as the power increases. Historic responsibility has to make up for the want of legal responsibility.
Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not authority, still more when you superadd the tendency or the certainty of corruption by authority. There is no worse heresy than that the office sanctifies the holder of it. That is the point at which the negation of Catholicism and the negation of Liberalism meet and keep high festival, and the end learns to justify the means. You would hang a man of no position like
Ravaillac; but if what one hears is true, then
Elizabeth asked the gaoler to murder
Mary, and
William III of England ordered his Scots minister to
extirpate a clan. Here are the greatest names coupled with the greatest crimes; you would spare those criminals, for some mysterious reason. I would hang them higher than
Haman, for reasons of quite obvious justice, still more, still higher for the sake of historical science. Thenceforth he steered clear of theological
polemics. He devoted himself to reading, study and congenial society. With all his capacity for study, he was a man of the world and a man of affairs, not a bookworm. His only notable publications were a masterly essay in the
Quarterly Review of January 1878 on "Democracy in Europe;" two lectures delivered at Bridgnorth in 1877 on "The History of Freedom in Antiquity" and "The History of Freedom in Christianity"—these last the only tangible portions put together by him of his long-projected "History of Liberty;" and an essay on modern German historians in the first number of the
English Historical Review, which he helped to found (1886). After 1879 he divided his time between London,
Cannes, and
Tegernsee in Bavaria, enjoying and reciprocating the society of his friends. In 1872 he had been given the honorary degree of Doctor of Philosophy by the
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU); in 1888 Cambridge gave him the honorary degree of
Doctor of Laws, and in 1889 Oxford the
Doctor of Civil Law; and in 1890 he received the high academic accolade of being made a fellow of
All Souls College, Oxford. In 1874, when Gladstone published his pamphlet on
The Vatican Decrees in their Bearing on Civil Allegiance, Lord Acton wrote during November and December a series of remarkable letters to
The Times, illustrating Gladstone's main theme by numerous historical examples of papal inconsistency, in a way which must have been bitter enough to the ultramontane party, but ultimately disagreeing with Gladstone's conclusion and insisting that the Church itself was better than its premises implied. Acton's letters led to another storm in the English Roman Catholic world, but once more it was considered prudent by the
Holy See to leave him alone. In spite of his reservations, he regarded "communion with Rome as dearer than life". ==Personal life==