It has been suggested that
B. dendrobatidis originated in
Africa or
Asia and subsequently spread to other parts of the world by trade in
African clawed frogs (
Xenopus laevis). In this study, 697 archived specimens of three species of
Xenopus, previously collected from 1879 to 1999 in southern Africa, were examined. The earliest case of chytridiomycosis was found in a
X. laevis specimen from 1938. The study also suggests that chytridiomycosis had been a stable infection in southern Africa from 23 years prior to finding any infected outside of Africa. American bullfrogs (
Lithobates catesbeianus), also widely distributed, are also thought to be carriers of the disease due to their inherent low susceptibility to
B. dendrobatidis infection. The bullfrog often escapes captivity and can establish
feral populations where it may introduce the disease to new areas. Infections have been linked to mass mortalities of amphibians in
North America,
South America,
Central America,
Europe and
Australia.
B. dendrobatidis has been implicated in the extinction of the sharp-snouted day frog (
Taudactylus acutirostris) in Australia. A wide variety of amphibian hosts have been identified as being susceptible to infection by
B. dendrobatidis, including wood frogs (
Lithobates sylvatica), the mountain yellow-legged frog (
Lithobates muscosa), the southern two-lined salamander (
Eurycea cirrigera), San Marcos Salamander (
Eurycea nana), Texas Salamander (
Eurycea neotenes), Blanco River Springs Salamander (
Eurycea pterophila), Barton Springs Salamander (
Eurycea sosorum), Jollyville Plateau Salamander (
Eurycea tonkawae),
Ambystoma jeffersonianum, the western chorus frog (
Pseudacris triseriata), the southern cricket frog (
Acris gryllus), the eastern spadefoot toad (
Scaphiopus holbrooki), the southern leopard frog (
Lithobates sphenocephala), the Rio Grande Leopard frog (
Lithobates berlandieri), the Sardinian newt (
Euproctus platycephalus), and endemic frog species, the Beysehir frog in Turkey (
Pelophylax caralitanus).
Southeast Asia While most studies concerning
B. dendrobatidis have been performed in various locations across the world, the presence of the fungus in Southeast Asia remains a relatively recent development. The exact process through which the fungus was introduced to Asia is not known, however, as mentioned above, it has been suggested transportation of
asymptomatic carrier species (e.g.
Lithobates catesbeianus, the American Bullfrog) may be a key component in the dissemination of the fungus, at least in
China. Initial studies demonstrated the presence of the fungus on island states/countries such as
Hong Kong,
Indonesia,
Taiwan, Soon thereafter, mainland Asian countries such as
Thailand,
South Korea, and China reported incidents of
B. dendrobatidis among their amphibian populations. Much effort has been put into classifying herpetofauna in countries like
Cambodia,
Vietnam, and
Laos where new species of frogs, toads, and other amphibians and reptiles are being discovered on a frequent basis. Scientists simultaneously are swabbing herpetofauna in order to determine if these newly discovered animals possess traces of the fungus. In Cambodia, a study showed
B. dendrobatidis to be prevalent throughout the country in areas near
Phnom Penh (in a village <5 km),
Sihanoukville (frogs collected from the local market),
Kratie (frogs collected from streets around the town), and
Siem Reap (frogs collected from a national preserve:
Angkor Centre for Conservation of Biodiversity). Another study in Cambodia questioned the potential anthropological impact in the dissemination of
B. dendrobatidis on local amphibian populations in three different areas in relation to human interaction: low (an isolated forest atop a mountain people rarely visit), medium (a forest road ~15 km from a village that is used at least once a week), and high (a small village where humans interact with their environment on a daily basis). Using
quantitative PCR, evidence of
B. dendrobatidis was found in all three sites with the highest percentage of amphibians positive for the fungus from the forest road (medium impact; 50%), followed by the mountain forest (low impact; 44%) and village (high impact; 36%). Human influence most likely explains detection of the fungus in the medium and high areas, however it does not provide an adequate explanation why even isolated amphibians were positive for
B. dendrobatidis. This may go unanswered until more research is performed on transmission of the fungus across landscapes. However, recent evidence suggests mosquitoes may be a possible vector which may help spread
B. dendrobatidis. Another study in French Guiana reports widespread infection, with 8 of 11 sites sampled being positive for
B. dendrobatidis infection for at least one species. This study suggests that
Bd (Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis) is more widespread than previously thought. == Effect on amphibians ==