The Bayanshiree Formation is primarily composed by varicoloured
claystones and
sandstones with calcareous concretions and characterized by grey mudstones and yellowish-brown medium grained sandstones. Up to thick, the most complete sections are found in the eastern
Gobi Desert, consisting of fine-grained, often cross-stratified gray sandstone interbedded with claystone and concretionary, intraformational
conglomerates with relatively thick units of red to brown
mudstone in the upper part. The Baynshire and Burkhant localities are mainly composed by mudstone,
siltstone, sandstone, and conglomerates, with most of their sedimentation being fluvial. largescale cross-stratification in many of the sandstone layers at the Baynshire locality seem to indicate that a large
meandering
fluvial system was present. It has been implied that during the late Bayan Shirehnian times, large
rivers with direct connections to the
sea drained a prominent part of the eastern Gobi region.
Stratigraphy According to Jerzykiewicz and Russell, the Bayanshiree Formation can be divided into 2 informal units: upper and lower beds. While the lower beds are composed by extensive conglomerate that indicates the ancient presence of very active rivers, the upper beds are mainly composed by mudstone and claystone that is
interbedded by sandstone, indicating again, the presence of rivers but also lakes and other
water bodies. However, examination of the
magnetostratigraphy of the formation indicates that the entire Bayanshiree lies within the
Cretaceous Long Normal, which lasted only until the end of the
Santonian stage, giving a possible
Cenomanian through Late Santonian age, between 98 and 83 million years ago.
Correlations A potential correlation between the
Iren Dabasu Formation has been long suggested by most authors, mainly based on the highly similar vertebrate assemblages. However, Van Itterbeeck et al. 2005 argued against this correlation concluding that instead, the Iren Dabasu Formation was coeval with the younger
Nemegt Formation based on the charophyte and ostracode assemblages; therefore, these formations were dated to the Late Campanian-Early Maastrichtian. Averianov and Sues instead proposed a correlation between the Bayanshiree, Iren Dabasu and
Bissekty formations. In 2015, Tsuihiji and team found the Iren Dabasu-Nemegt correlation to be inconsistent since the microfossil assemblages used by Van Itterbeeck and colleagues were not restricted to the Maastrichtian period and the similarities between these assemblages were most probably due to a similar deposition and climate settings. ==Paleobiota of the Bayanshiree Formation==