The four commutative diagrams can be read either as "comultiplication and counit are
homomorphisms of algebras" or, equivalently, "multiplication and unit are
homomorphisms of coalgebras". These statements are meaningful once we explain the natural structures of algebra and coalgebra in all the vector spaces involved besides
B: (
K, ∇0, η0) is a unital associative algebra in an obvious way and (
B ⊗
B, ∇2, η2) is a unital associative algebra with unit and multiplication :\eta_2 := (\eta \otimes \eta) : K \otimes K \equiv K \to (B \otimes B) :\nabla_2 := (\nabla \otimes \nabla) \circ (id \otimes \tau \otimes id) : (B \otimes B) \otimes (B \otimes B) \to (B \otimes B) , so that \nabla_2 ( (x_1 \otimes x_2) \otimes (y_1 \otimes y_2) ) = \nabla(x_1 \otimes y_1) \otimes \nabla(x_2 \otimes y_2) or, omitting ∇ and writing
multiplication as juxtaposition, (x_1 \otimes x_2)(y_1 \otimes y_2) = x_1 y_1 \otimes x_2 y_2 ; similarly, (
K, Δ0, ε0) is a coalgebra in an obvious way and
B ⊗
B is a coalgebra with counit and comultiplication :\epsilon_2 := (\epsilon \otimes \epsilon) : (B \otimes B) \to K \otimes K \equiv K :\Delta_2 := (id \otimes \tau \otimes id) \circ (\Delta \otimes \Delta) : (B \otimes B) \to (B \otimes B) \otimes (B \otimes B). Then, diagrams 1 and 3 say that Δ:
B →
B ⊗
B is a homomorphism of unital (associative) algebras (
B, ∇, η) and (
B ⊗
B, ∇2, η2) :\Delta \circ \nabla = \nabla_2 \circ (\Delta \otimes \Delta) : (B \otimes B) \to (B \otimes B), or simply Δ(
xy) = Δ(
x) Δ(
y), :\Delta \circ \eta = \eta_2 : K \to (B \otimes B), or simply Δ(1
B) = 1
B ⊗
B; diagrams 2 and 4 say that ε:
B →
K is a homomorphism of unital (associative) algebras (
B, ∇, η) and (
K, ∇0, η0): :\epsilon \circ \nabla = \nabla_0 \circ (\epsilon \otimes \epsilon) : (B \otimes B) \to K, or simply ε(
xy) = ε(
x) ε(
y) :\epsilon \circ \eta = \eta_0 : K \to K, or simply ε(1
B) = 1
K. Equivalently, diagrams 1 and 2 say that ∇:
B ⊗
B →
B is a homomorphism of (counital coassociative) coalgebras (
B ⊗
B, Δ2, ε2) and (
B, Δ, ε): : \nabla \otimes \nabla \circ \Delta_2 = \Delta \circ \nabla : (B \otimes B) \to (B \otimes B), : \nabla_0 \circ \epsilon_2 = \epsilon \circ \nabla : (B \otimes B) \to K; diagrams 3 and 4 say that η:
K →
B is a homomorphism of (counital coassociative) coalgebras (
K, Δ0, ε0) and (
B, Δ, ε): :\eta_2 \circ \Delta_0 = \Delta \circ \eta : K \to (B \otimes B), :\eta_0 \circ \epsilon_0 = \epsilon \circ \eta : K \to K, where :\epsilon_0 =id_K =\eta_0 . ==Examples==