Bisellium

The actual word bisellium is only found in the Roman sources once (Varro, De lingua latina) and is defined as a seat wide enough for two. The corresponding (also honor biselliatus) awarded to a person (biselliarius) is well documented, usually for the assistance of the municipality or colony, above all in donations of money for public events or public buildings. The honor recipients were primarily freedmen, which made them similar to Augustales. This was a rare honor (in the second Augustan region, 126 Augustales are known, but only three persons are found to be granted the bisellium) and sometimes prompted the recipient to donate another large sum of money to the city. The image of an honor was frequently placed on a tomb of the biselliarius, often with an epitath recording the honor bisellii award (unlike the curule seat or fasces, images of which on the tomb were never accompanied by text). A small group of reliefs includes a wreath resting on the bisellium with unclear meaning. The honor of the bisellium was a civic distinction granted by a decree of the local town council (decurions). It was typically awarded to wealthy patrons who had made significant financial contributions to the town, such as funding public buildings or games. The honor allowed the recipient to occupy this special seat at public gatherings (like a theatre or amphitheater), placing them in a position of prominence among the populace. It is unclear if any other special privileges were awarded with it. == False bisellia ==

The couches (klinēs) were common four-legged furniture pieces with wooden frame. While cheaper versions used wood throughout, the more elaborate ones used metal for frame fittings, fulcra (attachements for backrests), and legs. During the restoration, the frame fittings, that covered about half of the original wooden frame, were used to estimate the original size of furniture item found. As a result, the pieces were reconstituded into wide stools and declared to be biselliums, this tradition had started with E. Pistolesi in 1858. The results wound up in the literature (and museums). The problem was noticed by Walther Amelung in 1902. He suggested that "the bronze coverings of the wooden frame [...] were mistakenly placed against each other on the long sides," "[...] and only because this restoration resulted in a seat that was too large for a person, but too small for a bed, did people fall into the assumption that these are Bisellia". Amelung's paper led to changes in the future reconstructions and dismantling of the erroneously assembled pieces. == See also ==