Bochner's theorem for a
locally compact abelian group G, with dual group \widehat{G}, says the following:
Theorem For any normalized continuous positive-definite function f : G \to \mathbb{C} (normalization here means that f is 1 at the unit of G), there exists a unique
probability measure \mu on \widehat{G} such that f(g) = \int_{\widehat{G}} \xi(g) \,d\mu(\xi), i.e. f is the
Fourier transform of a unique probability measure \mu on \widehat{G}. Conversely, the Fourier transform of a probability measure on \widehat{G} is necessarily a normalized continuous positive-definite function f on G. This is in fact a one-to-one correspondence. The
Gelfand–Fourier transform is an
isomorphism between the
group C*-algebra C^*(G) and C_0(\widehat{G}). The theorem is essentially the dual statement for
states of the two abelian C*-algebras. The proof of the theorem passes through vector states on
strongly continuous unitary representations of G (the proof in fact shows that every normalized continuous positive-definite function must be of this form). Given a normalized continuous positive-definite function f on G, one can construct a strongly continuous unitary representation of G in a natural way: Let F_0(G) be the family of complex-valued functions on G with finite support, i.e. h(g) = 0 for all but finitely many g. The positive-definite kernel K(g_1, g_2) = f(g_1 - g_2) induces a (possibly degenerate)
inner product on F_0(G). Quotienting out degeneracy and taking the completion gives a Hilbert space (\mathcal{H}, \langle \cdot, \cdot\rangle_f), whose typical element is an equivalence class [h]. For a fixed g in G, the "
shift operator" U_g defined by (U_g h) (g') = h(g' - g), for a representative of [h], is unitary. So the map g \mapsto U_g is a unitary representations of G on (\mathcal{H}, \langle \cdot, \cdot\rangle_f). By continuity of f, it is weakly continuous, therefore strongly continuous. By construction, we have \langle U_g [e], [e] \rangle_f = f(g), where [e] is the class of the function that is 1 on the identity of G and zero elsewhere. But by Gelfand–Fourier isomorphism, the vector state \langle \cdot [e], [e] \rangle_f on C^*(G) is the
pullback of a state on C_0(\widehat{G}), which is necessarily integration against a probability measure \mu. Chasing through the isomorphisms then gives \langle U_g [e], [e] \rangle_f = \int_{\widehat{G}} \xi(g) \,d\mu(\xi). On the other hand, given a probability measure \mu on \widehat{G}, the function f(g) = \int_{\widehat{G}} \xi(g) \,d\mu(\xi) is a normalized continuous positive-definite function. Continuity of f follows from the
dominated convergence theorem. For positive-definiteness, take a nondegenerate representation of C_0(\widehat{G}). This extends uniquely to a representation of its
multiplier algebra C_b(\widehat{G}) and therefore a strongly continuous unitary representation U_g. As above we have f given by some vector state on U_g f(g) = \langle U_g v, v \rangle, therefore positive-definite. The two constructions are mutual inverses. == Special cases ==