(
Glareola maldivarum), a living species of the possibly related genus
Glareola Mayr and Smith (2001) tentatively assigned
Boutersemia to the charadriiform
family Glareolidae. In extant Charadriiformes, the large distal vascular foramen is only found in three families: the Glareolidae,
Jacanidae, and
Charadriidae. The coracoids referred to
Boutersemia are quite similar to those of living charadriids and glareolids, as they have a foramen for the supracoracoid nerve, which is absent in other charadriiform families such as
Rostratulidae (painted-snipes),
Scolopacidae (sandpipers), and
Thinocoridae (seedsnipes). The distinct fossa for the hallux is
plesiomorphic (ancestral) for charadriiforms, and is only absent in charadriids, suggesting
Boutersemia is not a member of this clade. In a 2005 review of European Paleogene fossil birds, Mayr reiterated the tentative assignment of
Boutersemia to the Glareolidae, but cautioned that this was based on similarities that may be plesiomorphic, and thus not indicative of an exclusive position in this family. Within Glareolidae,
Boutersemia is most similar to
Glareola and
Stiltia (which may be a member of
Glareola), in the subfamily
Glareolinae, compared to other glareolids in the subfamily
Cursoriinae (
Cursorius and
Rhinoptilus), which have reduced halluces and smaller distal vascular foramina. In 2014, N. Adam Smith and
Julia A. Clarke published an analysis focused on the evolution of the
Pan-Alcidae (the charadriiform group including
puffins,
auks, and their relatives). To test the relationships of this group and its position within the Charadriiformes, the researchers compiled a
phylogenetic matrix incorporating both morphological and molecular data, broadly sampling extant charadriiforms, with the inclusion of several extinct species.
Boutersemia belgica was included, though the fragmentary nature of the material referred to it allowed it to be scored for only 1.7% of morphological characters in the matrix. Given its age, molecular data is not available. The
phylogenetic analysis performed by these researchers recovered
B. belgica within the Jacanidae, in an unresolved clade also including
Hydrophasianus chirurgus (pheasant-tailed jacana) and the extinct jacanid
Nupharanassa bulotorum. Characters supporting the placement of
Boutersemia as a jacanid include a particularly large distal vascular foramen compared to other charadriiforms, a tendinal groove that is deeply incised on the anterior (front) tarsometatarsus near the end of the second metatarsal, and a compressed shaft of the tarsometatarsus. All of the characters scoreable for
Boutersemia are also seen in
Hydrophasianus, making it a taxonomic equivalent of this taxon. The
cladogram below displays the results of these researchers' phylogenetic analysis: In 2020, De Pietri, Mayr, and Scofield published a reassessment of the charadriiform species
Becassius charadriioides, which had previously been identified as a member of
Scolopaci with uncertain affinities. The researchers concluded it is actually a member of the Glareolidae closely related to
Boutersemia. They explained that additional comparisons with living and fossil glareolids supported this conclusion with more confidence than what had been proposed in the original 2001 description by Mayr & Smith. As part of a publication on a comprehensive time-calibrated phylogeny of charadriiforms in 2022, Černý and Natale noted that the reassessment of
Becassius by De Pietri et al. relied only on overall morphology to place
Boutersemia within Glareolidae, rather than providing specific
apomorphies (derived traits). Since this conflicts with the phylogenetic results published by Smith & Clarke (2014)—the only phylogenetic analysis including
Boutersemia published at that point—the authors concluded the affinities of
Boutersemia should be regarded as uncertain. == Palaeoenvironment ==