Both Brans–Dicke theory and general relativity are examples of a class of
relativistic classical field theories of
gravitation, called
metric theories. In these theories,
spacetime is equipped with a
metric tensor, g_{ab}, and the gravitational field is represented (in whole or in part) by the
Riemann curvature tensor R_{abcd}, which is determined by the metric tensor. All metric theories satisfy the
Einstein equivalence principle, which in modern geometric language states that in a very small region (too small to exhibit measurable
curvature effects), all the laws of physics known in
special relativity are valid in
local Lorentz frames. This implies in turn that metric theories all exhibit the
gravitational redshift effect. As in general relativity, the source of the gravitational field is considered to be the
stress–energy tensor or
matter tensor. However, the way in which the immediate presence of mass-energy in some region affects the gravitational field in that region differs from general relativity. So does the way in which spacetime curvature affects the motion of matter. In the Brans–Dicke theory, in addition to the metric, which is a
rank two tensor field, there is a
scalar field, \phi, which has the physical effect of changing the
effective gravitational constant from place to place. (This feature was actually a key
desideratum of Dicke and Brans; see the paper by Brans cited below, which sketches the origins of the theory.) The field equations of Brans–Dicke theory contain a
parameter, \omega, called the
Brans–Dicke coupling constant. This is a true
dimensionless constant which must be chosen once and for all. However, it can be chosen to fit observations. Such parameters are often called
tunable parameters. In addition, the present ambient value of the effective gravitational constant must be chosen as a
boundary condition. General relativity contains no dimensionless parameters whatsoever, and therefore is easier to
falsify (show whether false) than Brans–Dicke theory. Theories with tunable parameters are sometimes deprecated on the principle that, of two theories which both agree with observation, the more
parsimonious is preferable. On the other hand, it seems as though they are a necessary feature of some theories, such as the
weak mixing angle of the
Standard Model. Brans–Dicke theory is "less stringent" than general relativity in another sense: it admits more solutions. In particular, exact vacuum solutions to the
Einstein field equation of general relativity, augmented by the trivial scalar field \phi=1, become exact vacuum solutions in Brans–Dicke theory, but some spacetimes which are
not vacuum solutions to the Einstein field equation become, with the appropriate choice of scalar field, vacuum solutions of Brans–Dicke theory. Similarly, an important class of spacetimes, the
pp-wave metrics, are also exact
null dust solutions of both general relativity and Brans–Dicke theory, but here too, Brans–Dicke theory allows additional
wave solutions having geometries which are incompatible with general relativity. Like general relativity, Brans–Dicke theory predicts
light deflection and the
precession of
perihelia of planets orbiting the Sun. However, the precise formulas which govern these effects, according to Brans–Dicke theory, depend upon the value of the coupling constant \omega. This means that it is possible to set an observational lower bound on the possible value of \omega from observations of the
Solar System and other gravitational systems. The value of \omega consistent with experiment has risen with time. In 1973 \omega > 5 was consistent with known data. By 1981 \omega > 30 was consistent with known data. In 2003 evidence – derived from the
Cassini–Huygens experiment – shows that the value of \omega must exceed 40,000. It is also often taught that general relativity is obtained from the Brans–Dicke theory in the limit \omega \rightarrow \infty. But Faraoni claims that this breaks down when the trace of the stress-energy momentum vanishes, i.e. T^{\mu}_{\mu} = 0, an example of which is the
Campanelli–
Lousto wormhole solution. Some have argued that only general relativity satisfies the strong
equivalence principle. == The field equations ==