The event immediately sparked claims and counter-claims by both nations. Pakistan claimed that the plane was unarmed and the
debris was found on Pakistan's side of the border, and there was no violation of Indian
airspace. According to the official Pakistan version of events, the plane was on a routine training mission inside Pakistan air space. The Pakistani Prime Minister stated during the funeral service of the airmen that the shooting was a barbaric act. and
Sir Creek area, where the plane was shot down and wreckage was found respectively. The Indian Air force claimed that the aeroplane did not respond to international protocol and that it acted in a "hostile" manner, adding that the debris of a downed aircraft could fall over a wide
radius. (although Pakistan claimed the Atlantic was not a combat aircraft). According to them, the Pakistani claim was untenable since the primary role of the Atlantic is for operations over the sea and that to carry out a training flight over land deep inside foreign territory was an indication of its use in a surveillance role. Indian analysts state "flare-ups" in the Rann of Kutch region were routine, and despite bilateral agreements, both India and Pakistan had conducted air intrusions in the past. Thus, the fact that the Atlantic was shot down, despite coming close to the Indian border, came as a surprise. Some Indian analysts stated that the Atlantic was nearly destroyed in 1983 on a similar encounter and noted other close encounters and violations from Pakistani naval planes. Some experts stated that the Atlantic was probably conducting a "probe" on India's
air defence system, mainly the
radar equipment in the border area; they advised that it was not part of any planned aggressive military action by Pakistan. Many countries, the
G8, the
permanent members of the UN Security Council, as well as the western media questioned the wisdom behind Pakistan's decision to fly military aircraft so close to the Indian border. ==Rise in tensions==