In the weeks after the lynching, several abolitionists condemned the events, including newspaper editor
Elijah Lovejoy. Lovejoy ran the Presbyterian religious newspaper,
St. Louis Observer. He published abolitionist, temperance, and anti-Catholic editorials. The
Observer header on May 5, 1836, suggested that the lynching of McIntosh effectively ended the rule of Law and Constitution in St. Louis. As a result of mob pressure and outright attacks on his press, Lovejoy was forced to move from St. Louis to
Alton, Illinois, in the free state. But in November 1837, after he had acquired and hidden a new press, a white anti-abolition mob attacked the warehouse where it was stored. He was fatally shot and murdered in the altercation, as was a man named Bishop in the mob. One New York abolitionist newspaper,
The Emancipator, noted that "the circumstances attending the burning of a negro alive, at the West, are known.... The Spaniards may have murdered monks by the score, the Mexicans may have shot prisoners by the dozen, but roasting alive before a slow fire is a practice nowhere except among free, enlightened, high-minded Americans." In January 1838, future President
Abraham Lincoln referred to the McIntosh lynching as an example in his
address at the Lyceum. No other state legislator in Illinois or Missouri condemned the mob action. Shortly after the lynching, a St. Louis newspaper, the
Missouri Republican, noted that abolitionists were attempting to gather McIntosh's remains in an effort to bring them to the Eastern United States, as a symbol of the evils of slavery. In the years following the lynching, visitors to the city (often from McIntosh's home town of
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) went to the tree and removed parts of it as memorial keepsakes. ==See also==