The first inquiry Just over a week after the hijacking
David Shipler,
The New York Times correspondent in Israel, filed a report revealing that the daily newspaper
Hadashot had a photograph, taken by
Alex Levac, of one of the hijackers being led away in handcuffs. Their journalists had positively identified the man in the picture as Majdi Abu Jummaa, aged 18, one of the four dead. The story was re-published around the world. The story was broken in Israel on Sunday 22 April by
Al HaMishmar of the
Mapam party. In a lead story passed by the censor they quoted "authorized senior sources" as saying that there was no alternative to the establishment of a commission of inquiry into the deaths of the two hijackers. On 24 April David Shipler was summoned to the office of the director of the Government press office,
Mordechai Dolinsky, and was "severely reprimanded." It was believed that his Israeli press credentials were not revoked only because he was leaving his post shortly anyway. On 25 April the weekly
HaOlam HaZeh (This World), which had appeared with blank spaces the week before, published on its front page a blurred picture of a man being led away. The editor of the magazine,
Uri Avnery, had overcome the censors' opposition after threatening to take the case to the High Court. , editor of
Hadashot, confirmed to correspondents that the man in the picture was not Majdi Abu Jammaa. On 27 April
Hadeshot was ordered to stop publishing for four days. This punishment, which had not been applied to a Jewish publication for over fifteen years, was due to their reporting that Minister of Defence Arens had set up a committee of inquiry, headed by Reserve General
Meir Zorea. This information had been released to the
Editors Committee of Israel's major newspapers on condition that the information was not published.
Hadeshot, owned by the publishers of the respected ''
Ha'aretz'' newspaper, was not a member of the Editors Committee. Zorea's report was delivered in secret to the parliamentary
Foreign Affairs and Security Committee on 29 May. Its findings were not made public but were said to have "stunned the security establishment." At the same time
Hadashot refuted Moshe Arens' statement that he had not been at the scene of the hijacking by claiming that their photographer had been standing beside him shortly before he took the picture of Majdi Abu Jammaa. Concerns were also being raised about a television interview that Arens had given shortly after the event when he said: "Whoever plans terrorist acts in Israel must know that he will not get out alive." The IDF Chief of Staff,
Raphael Eitan, had made a similar statement: "Terrorists must know that they will not come out alive from such an operation."
The trial In 1985 Brigadier General
Yitzhak Mordechai, who had led the storming of the bus, and eleven others were put on trial for the killing of the two prisoners. They were accused of being among a larger group who beat and kicked the prisoners to death. Witnesses described the General hitting the prisoners with a pistol. He was cleared of the charges, and the charges against the others dropped. In the spring of 1986 the deputy chief of
Shin Bet, Reuven Hazak and two officials Rafi Malka and Peleg Raday, met Prime Minister
Shimon Peres and accused their superior,
Avraham Shalom, of having ordered the murders and coordinating the testimonies of witnesses in the case against General Mordechai. Peres refused to act on this information and the three officials were dismissed from the Shin Bet. They then gave evidence that led
Attorney General Yitzhak Zamir to launch a criminal probe against the senior Shin Bet officials accused of covering up the killings. His resignation was reported in the international media and Israeli newspapers were able to bypass the
Military Censor with revelations about the Shin Bet. It became public that Avraham Shalom was accused of ordering the killing of the two prisoners and organising an extensive cover-up which included implicating General Mordechai. In June 1986 a little-known judge,
Yosef Harish, took over as Attorney General and President
Chaim Herzog issued a blanket pardon to Shalom and four other Shin Bet officers. These pardons were challenged in the
Supreme court. During the appeal papers were revealed in which Shalom asserted that all his actions were "authorised and approved." This implicated the Prime Minister at the time of the killings –
Yitzhak Shamir. On 6 August 1986 the Supreme Court upheld the pardons, but Attorney General Harish promised there would be an investigation.
Effects of the affair The affair had significantly damaged the Shin Bet's reputation and public image in Israel. It also led to a re-examination of
censorship in Israel after it became evident that the censors had contributed to the cover-up of the affair. As part of the overall investigation of Shin Bet during the affair it was discovered that the organization routinely used physical force during interrogations which led to the establishment of the
Landau Commission to investigate the organization's interrogation and other procedures. According to Israeli journalist
Gideon Levy, the people who exposed the scandal were never honoured, and those who covered up the incident went on to prestigious careers.
Ehud Yatom In 1996 retiring Shin Bet officer
Ehud Yatom gave an interview to the daily
Yediot Aharonot in which he is quoted as saying: "I smashed their skulls," on orders from Shin Bet head Avraham Shalom, and "I'm proud of everything I've done." Yatom said he put the men on stretchers into a van. "On the way I received an order from Avraham Shalom to kill the men, so I killed them." "Only clean, moral hands in Shin Bet can do what is needed in a democratic state." From 2003 to 2006 Yatom was a Member of the Knesset. ==Popular culture==