Sadovszky taught in Germany, and in the U.S. at
UC Berkeley, UCLA, and the
University of Nevada, Reno before joining the
Cal State Fullerton in
Orange County south of Los Angeles in 1971. He continued working there until his retirement in 1994, even after achieving professor emeritus status in 1991.
Cal-Ugrian theory Sadovszky elaborates the Cal-Ugrian theory in his 1996 book. The theory describes the proposed relationship between the
Penutian languages native to California (itself a disputed hypothesis) and the
Ob-Ugric languages spoken in Siberia. According to Sadovszky, this relationship is based on more than 10,000 different words and grammatical traits. The Penutian languages were or are spoken in an area along the
Northern California coast from
Bodega Bay to
Big Sur as well as along the
Sacramento and
San Joaquin rivers; the Ob-Ugric languages by 6,000
Mansi and 17,000
Khanty, east of the
Urals. One claim of Sadovszky's theory is that the ancestors of some California tribes arrived only 3,000 years ago, which is much more recently than the origin of most tribes in the Americas which according to the generally accepted theory regarding the
settlement of the Americas date their original migrations to around 20,000 years ago across the Bering Strait. In contrast, the migration around 1,000 B.C.E. would have occurred from the
Ob river delta across the Arctic Ocean in summer months and down the American coast.
Criticism The Cal-Ugrian theory was not well accepted in the United States, with some linguists noting that Sadovszky was not trained in comparative linguistics although he had done some fieldwork among California Indians. As a result, his book was published abroad, and the upshot was that he gained a reputation for his knowledge of Indo-European and Uralic languages but more so in Europe than in the United States. Evidence for a relatively recent marine migration is very limited, but Sadovszky claims that archaeological and other evidence back up the linguistic evidence of his theory but there has been little interest in further research in this area. Specialists in the
Uralic languages have generally rejected Sadovszky's theory, citing general lack of understanding of the methods of
comparative linguistics, leading to his work being riddled with problems such as poor semantic and phonetic correspondences. Sadovszky often makes no effort to show that some material he compares is truly native within the two language groups he compares, often
cherrypicking examples from just one or two of the dozens of languages encompassed by "Penutian". The
Dené-Yeniseian language theory linking a cluster of Siberian and Native American languages has been much better received than Sadovszky's theory. == Selected works ==